Getting Ready

(first attempt)


... ready for ... programming? Well, minding my own self I have tensions. And I'm confused. When thinking about what I want to do I feel something preventing me from doing so. So, right now there isn't any way for me to go it seems. Except there is something else that I feel the need to write about, ... and by doing so I would go do something that I don't really feel confident about. But, thinking it through - there comes a point that when I have some working code there is that amount of time that passed - and if I plan on succeeding ever, I should then have something I can stick with.


What I am compelled to tell you about is ... a reasoning behind what I did on my new Computer. Strange ... right? I mean, ... I did something (creating a folder (C:\Meta)) - and on arguing about why (because of all the reasons of failure I keep dragging along) I came to an argument that stuck with me - as all those other things I use(d) to write about.

The argument is that, going forward (into the future) - [here's a shortie on trickle down economics that I couldn't finish but it fits into the sense of this] we want to think of a unified Operating System. If Operating System goes 'too far', maybe rather start thinking of an I.T. framework everyone is familiar with.
This is kindof Pro vs Anti Capitalist.

But not truely. We can still think in terms of money and financing. But what we do by blocking out Corporations is that we disable them from doing stuff with our privacy concerns. For instance. The idea of a Corporation driving the economy thanks to which we have these fancy items is OK, ... but it is superficial, thinking that on purchasing a Computer I have very little choice when it gets to whats running on them. In the spirit of Linux it doesn't matter whether Windows works or not. Linux is all about variety for maybe not even a really practical reason. "Rose Linux" was a thing. Because ... Roses as wallpapers. Something like that. And if I fancy writing my own OS - there's a lot of obstacles thanks to ... financing issues. So there is no doubt stuff that works the way it works - and whenever we hit a paywall that is in some way like 'hitting bedrock' - because, where money is involved ... things 'work' ... somehow.
And democracy - thats a business too. A popularity contest as well. Getting to be a part of the few, of which a few are those of which another few get close to becoming a real person of influence or something like that. ANd so yea, eventually there is money involved. Think of all the logistics. Those people want to get payed. And if there is someone with enough money to pay, they are willing to take the deal.

If there is a problem - I'd say it is that "the ongoings" aren't sober, clean/'righteous'. That there is stuff going on that lots of people don't know about, or don't understand, ... in context, ... well - an impossible mess.
It all somehow works because of money. People live and buy, ... but sometimes people buy stuff from companies that for instance ... exploit third world countries. Thus they make an increased profit and can outgrow their concurrence.

And thats how the 'capitalism creates slavery' argument comes together. If you're bent on making profit in a large scale ... its one thing if you run a security company that relies on competent people; Yet another if you run a factory where basically anyone could do the work. Which means you can put them in places where you don't need to worry for education ... while keeping the country poor is like keeping the factory cheap.

Maybe. Its maybe not that simple but something is though still smelly about this. While a benevolent employee would pay more from having more, there are those who'd rather go to paying less for yielding more. Or reselling the resources of 3rd world countries back to them with a 1st world price tag on it.

Does benevolence really not work out?


What about lazy people? Don't they have a right to exist?

What I mean is that in terms of concurrence, two concurring sides shouldn't be at war with each other. But however. What I'm doing here is basically just saying that ... on this computer there is a folder named 'Meta', /// and that as being a component of the system I envision. And it doesn't wear a 'brand label'. Like ... MinGW right next to it. It sits there ... waiting to get filled. Sayonara.//2017.12.12|19:15