I'm currently watching (well, it's on pause) this:
And just prior to that seeing Mehdi Hassan interview an Andor Star - and right now that's giving me a bit
of hope. But then the other day I was seeing some Irish lass going off about some American tourist and to make
a point she was referencing a group of German people ... bringing up one of them as a negative example regarding
how OUR government is reacting to Pro Palestine protests; And ... oh boy ... the stunlock is real.
I mean, it's been a while now since ... people started to speak about how our Police is like cozy with our
Nationalists. How Left-Wing activism is met with a lot more resistence. And since then ... that whole aparatus
is just operating with less and less camouflage. And so - on a sidenote: This is an Anarcho-Capitalist takeover.
I mean, to name it like that ... is maybe the best way of identifying the THREAT.
The baseline. Whether it be coated in OUR "need for Order" or Israel's idea of what it means to be "the Chosen".
(Why Anarcho-Capitalists Aren't Anarchists! (Thought Slime)
- it can be overstated how this Video Aged like wine given how short and unelaborative it is; But I owe my understanding
of Anarchism to this dude, so ... there You go.)
And sure, a part of it ... has to be just the natural way of things. Like, in some sense ... if You join the police
You kind of have to be nationalistic. Sortof. Like, there's two camps. The Justice seekers; And "the Keepers of the
Body". And when those don't follow a shared Identity, there's going to be conflict and what we have now may be
Inevitable. The scale and outgrowths of that conflict however ... . It involves a lot more than just "Police" and
"Nationalism" ... like ... "corruption knows no boundaries" let's say.
Here then is how the average IDF soldier is Human Excrement: So, there's the Head who's running the Machina, the
Young Israeli dude comes in, gets "educated" and comes out as a Piece of shit. Can't put it any more simple than
that.
Sure You can say the same of Hamas and every other Military or whatever ... sure. You can remove the significance of
the words You use to make it seem like we're all the same; But then ... what are You (Zionist) saying?
Isn't like what "You" do ... "special"?
I mean, sorry, let me elaborate ...
So, first of all I think it's important that we all kind of settle down and respect that everyone has some kind of
national identity and a relationship with that identity. And so on and so forth. So, if I say that Yours sucks and
You tell me that I also have one - I'm not saying that having one sucks, I'm saying that the one You're having
does. And if You're incapable of dealing with that, well ... there's a few possible options. Most simplistically
You don't have the tools to do anything but deny and wrestle for excuses.
If You then for instance believe that You're a superior human being; Above "normal people" even; And You really aren't
in as far as I could tell; Well, a lot of what I have to say would sound like an insult. If I tell You that there's
nothing about You that tells me that You're superior to me, that must be annoying to You then. And me pointing that
out ... that's the salt into the wound. But if You have some high and mighty military ... You can just "whatever"
... turn around ... and "show me who's what".
Further, I suppose that it is important to accept - that's where a lot of the (ill gained) support for Israel is coming
from - that if all the people AROUND You speak of Jihad and look at You when doing so; You might feel encouraged to
look at Your own stuff and look for the same.
Religious extremism versus Religious extremism. But that's the next Problem. By doing so, You're becoming a Terrorist.
Just like them. If You say: "OK, let me make up my own BS to come back at You" - and You then go to violate every law
in the book - ... well, I suppose You might barely even realize how after then believing in Your own BS ... it's You
who became the Monster.
In the aftermath of WW2, some Hannah Ahrendt coined the term "the Banality of Evil". And that sentence: "We fight this
War for Peace" - it has a taste of that, when You're living a comfortable life. Like, You have family and culture and
You're telling the young Boys that it's for "Love" to not tear them out of their comfort zone and to further cultivate
this sense of peace and harmony; Basically: Living a Normal life while 'casually' planning the extermination of a people.
Sounds familiar?
Greetings from Germany!
See ... my Religion ... I have by choice. Not to say that all Christians are Christians "by choice" - or their particular
brand of Christian at least - and there we have similar problems except we tend not to blow each other up over it.
If You're born Protestant, eventually that's Your identity - regardless of the underpinning truths. And so You get to
this weird situation with North Ireland ... where, yea, I guess the Catholics were like "the Good guys" in a way. But it's
not a Religious conflict as much as it is ... from what I've read (which isn't much) ... a class issue.
Muslims and Jews however - from what I know have a lot less options. I mean, You can be atheistic or at least
atheism-adjacant, like ... both of You ... or ALL THREE of You ... I want to say: WE (here counting myself to the
atheistic/atheism-adjacant (A/AA) group) still exist. And sorry, but ... we don't have a reason to "let You sort
it out". Like, whatever "little Game" it is You think You're playing - to be harsh for a bit - the rest of us still
exist and Your "trust me bro" style arguing ... it's kind of ignorant.
So, You say You're chosen. Chosen for what? The way it says in Your book: "This old Covenant they broke" - so, why
are You still there acting like it's a thing? You can say that, uhm ... "whatever I make up is the new Covenant" -
but again: With the Old Covenant we had divine plagues, a Fire Column, a lot of "unusual stuff" that may hint at
something divine or otherworldly. With Jesus we had similar stories. In hindsight we can deny that any of it ever
happened - how would we know? But, if You say that Jesus didn't happen, then ... from a neutral standpoint:
the Exodus never happened. I mean, there are hints that suggest that something happened - but whether or not it's
enough to say that the Exodus happened ... could be up for debate.
I mean ... I have my own interpretation of those 'findings' - because: I believe that it happened and so I put more
value into those things that suggest that it did.
So, You (probably) say to Yourself: We have all these weapons and money and support ... surely it'd be easy to
just delete "them" and make it stick. To call it "God's Will". Maybe not YOU you, but ... still ... . Call it Culture.
I understand that ... Jews/Israelis have a somewhat unique relationship with their homeland. I'm currently like back
at it again. I mean, having like ... God given rights/favors in a world that doesn't necessarily respect them.
And so, sure, as per the divine graces, still there somehow.
And I'd be ... cheating ... a little ... if I were to glance past my own struggles ... and ambitions of faith while
those graces wouldn't show. Like, I'm not "the bigger person" in the sense that I ... did everything right. I didn't!
I had to learn.
Like so, Jesus spoke about Exaltation and Humility. If we want to be truly great, in Heaven, we have to humble
ourselves. For, if I were to exalt myself, on what basis would I do so? What makes me so great? That I can pull
something from my arse and make You think that it's Gold? I saw a piece from T1J about a show named "Kevin can
F**k himself" yesterday - which I watched because I'm not susbcribed to Amazon Prime anymore - and that's really
the vibe here. Well, then I watched his Piece "How Elaine Became the Villain of Seinfeld" ... which was an eye
opener regarding how actually messed up this show is (like, the two in context of each other) - which in short
boils down to this: A bad person does a bad thing, but the laughs make You think it's comedy. You accept it,
somehow, laugh along, because it's silly ... but somehow You end up accepting behavior like that. "It's just fun"
- until You yourself get hurt.
And these days I'm sure I can openly say that these things aren't abstracts 'anymore'. We now have "World Governments"
that act as Abusive Entities. And however You want to sell it to Yourself; ALL THREE OF YOU are Guilty of supporting
this abuse - as though You're in on it together. And Yet You do so by calling one another Mortal Enemies.
You put Your energy into fighting these silly wars - rather than fighting the injustices that lead to these conflicts
in the first place.
Like ... say Jihad or whatever ... it's on for as long as it's on. I mean, I can't pretend that it isn't an ongoing
thing and very well ... I'm a part of it. In as far as God has a say in it and I'm pro-actively involved with Him.
The REAL Jihad.
But so, why fight in the first place? About what? I mean, sure, call me naive, call me a "Goodie Two Shoes" (well, I'm
a Christian!) - but, You mutually acting like it's Your holy duty to kill the other; Like that's the only option; Don't
You see how that might piss the other off?
"At least Muslims are like consistent with it."
Wow! What a can of Worms. This is the big one!
I mean, from here I can see; Yea, the Israelis kind of have a point. But it isn't like ... "we just want to be home
and look at what's surrounding us!" - there is ... the issue of "who owns the Land" ... and what either group that
lays claim to it intends of doing with it. I mean, the fact that people other than Israelis occupy the promised Land
goes like ... way back. Since Nebuchadnezzar took Jerusalem ... that jig's been up!
Since then, however You might want to spin it, Your claim to the Land is ENTIRELY dependent on other people's good
will.
If God wants to say that it's Yours - sure, let Him. And for sakes of keeping it real: Yes, it kind of is but it also
kind of isn't, You know?! But is He now there with You, chharging the Fight for all of us to see? If we are to respect
that Narrative - then we want to SEE IT!
So, what do You do? You just go there and say: go away - and they don't and then You start violence - and thus the
cycle continues. And the absence of God within all this tells me that ... this isn't quite what He wanted. And yea,
people may speak of how "everything that IS, is HOW HE WANTED" - but that narrative poison's the well.
The one moment You speak of our agency, appealing to our emotions or whatever to take up responsibility and all that;
And the next You speak of how there's nothing we can do. That God works in mysterious ways, that we're not even
free.
Have it make sense!
OF COURSE it's complicated!
That's what I'm trying to tell You. And I'm like ... holding the "Speaking Pony" right now, don't I?
Sure, He set the stage ... but where is He now ... so that the rest of us can also tell?
I mean, it's weird how we like ... within all this ... also kind of tend to casually ignore like ... half of the
population of the Planet.
Like - we may call ourselves "believers", but we have to see that our Invisible God is also kind of Invisible to
THEM. Now, I may sometimes feel like I need (sort of) Therapy because of "my Invisible Friend" - but I'm grown
enough to understand that I'm not the problem here.
Then You want to tell me that this isn't about God?
Sure thing, who would have thunkit?
But then You use God to say that You're entitled to this Genocide?
It's like a Flat Earther arguing that Gravity is Buoyancy, actually - where, mind You: Gravity is why Buoyancy
works!
I can't stress enough how weird it is that I can't stress this enough.
And to make one thing clear: The violence I speak of - it's different because ... we can't have it unless we're
united about it. United enough to unite around it make it happen. To take action to the tune of: First cleaning
the inside - removing the beam from within our own eye - before turning outward in an attempt to remove the
splinter in the eye of the other.
Or do You want to say that it's about God after all?
How?
Because ... Might makes right?
And who is this? Who is there ... speaking like that? I mean ... usually the story goes like: "Nobody does" -
but still it's all You hear about. So how is it? Why does the world act as if ... that's what it is?
Because Might DOES make right?
I mean ... it kind of does; But not quite. I mean, if You hold power ... You CAN in fact ALSO care about what's
right. It's like ... I don't know ... all that we accross cultures generally tend to believe in and preach
telling us stories and parables and such.
And that's then what they are. "Stories". Like ... is it a noble endeavour to go out and test those lines? To
see if there truly is divine Karma? Like, the last time wasn't enough?
I mean - so we might tell until we look at ... a more hidden evil that we haven't quite gotten to root out
just yet. And yea, how would Karma reach it? I mean, we may have seen it in movies. The villain that's smart about
how the Universe works. But why?
Like ... sure. You can taunt us ... but hasn't the world become a better place, overall, still? Wasn't there always
enough to say: Yes, there is a goal! There is a light at the end of the tunnel! ?? So, in the meantime You want
to tell us that God doesn't care ... virtually shooting someone just to prove that point? You want to say that God
HAS TO break into the Atmosphere ... and stop You from doing Evil?
I mean, I see the point! And that same sentiment is shared by the Bible. By the way. I mean, that's the thing. It's
like ... there in the writing.
It's like: Let me prove to You that Water doesn't make wet! Look: It rains - but I'm under a roof. So, how can water
make wet if ... it rains, but I'm not wet? Have it make sense? Roof? What Roof? There is no Roof!
Another silly take is the idea that they're some divine avenger. Like, sure. TO make it easier for us we may think
that all the victims of theirs deserved it. But ... the understanding I'm ruminating about is a bit darker.
But, for once ... if so, if it's like "Evil punishing itself" - fine. It's still Evil and I can only develop sympathies
if there's like ... enough good to make it work. So, if there's a sense of justice, a basis for reasoning and all
that. But uhm ... ignoring the "but I do" slop ... what if they're hunting? Like ... "Wickedness Maxxing"? It would
depend on how one might be able to make distinctions. If someone wanted to find something, what could they find? So,
yea - at the end of the day, I'll have to let God be the judge.
I'm sure I won't get shit for trying to do the right thing. Live by the sword, die by the sword.
Sure, if God could tell me "But I told You better than that!" - then yea. If I did the wrong thing for what I thought
were the right reasons; That's on me. I watched enough Star Trek to understand that.
But so, we still have two sides out for revenge with a bag of grievances to draw from. And ... I have more than just
a maybe to be on the side of Islam; Although ... not quite on board with some interpretations thereof.
But it is what it is. Think of it: We can't just break apart the struggle without being somewhat guilty ourselves.
WHERE we can break the structures of power, amidst ourselves, THAT's where we are. Not in some abstract far and
distant way. But the structures and systems that determine our immediate real-time existence.
And yea, it's nice if the Muslims could just "go away" and leave the lands to "the chosen" - I guess. But ... to do
that You kind of need a lot of faith in God. Like ... A LOT A LOT. Like ... ALOTALOTALOT. You're after all making
an "all of Your life" kind of decision based on some ... abstract idea. And we're currently getting gaslit into
sustaining some such idea. But so we'd use violence to remove them; "Asking them Kindly" ... which is Functionally
the same to ... them leaving voluntarily, so ... "Yay!"??
The thing then is, that within Islam ... they aren't given much reason to take anything that a Jew says at face
value. And I suppose those are the Jews that are "there" being obnoxious as opposed to those that are somewhere
else just happening to be Jews.
But alas ... prejudice is a real problem.
So, here's the narrative they present: being anti-Israel/anti-Zionist is antisemitic (Uhm, the descendants of Ismael
are also Semites, technically - or am I getting this wrong?) because they self-proclaim themselves as Superior. So,
if we say that they don't have the right to kill whom they want; And if we don't accept that they're just better than
us; Then we're antisemitic.
And from how it looks they're trying to be Serious. Like, less so to prove it, but ... "Might makes Right".
So yea, I don't like that narrative.
And we have to call a Zionist what a Zionist is: A Fascist.
So, as a German and how our reluctance to cut ties with Israel over this is indicative of Racism ... I would want to
say that You have to forgive us our racism. But ... no You don't! We wouldn't give You the same courtesy either.
And that leads to problems. Eventually there are these and those beefing with each other ... and while it always
takes two; We have to put a stop to it. Who else is there?
Who are we? We can forgive each other - and we work towards being forgiven. I mean, as a post WW2 German I want to
say that "we're at home here" - but who is and isn't at home here, that's also not that simple; And I really actually
kind of don't want anyone to "Might makes Right" one over the other. We can say that - "Yes, but we're in the right
here" ... until ... we start to take out the skin-color chart and take note of what color someone's eyes are - because,
we have to make sure to really know WHO is RIGHT here. Like, "if You have money we might make an exception nudge-nudge
wink-wink".
Right right.
It's complicated, but it also isn't really all that complicated.
Oof, am I still being ... I mean, possibly the one or the other gaslighting campaign worked on me; And it's kind of
low key insidious how ignorance works. That, while ignorant of something (not by intention), it kind of doesn't show.
So we think we're right but we're not.
Now - as for ... my own campaign of bloodshed:
Homeland Security (not referring to any existing entities that call themselves that) has the duty to protect the lands
against outside threats. These lands, well, they might start in our living rooms without extending far beyond. We can
hold on to existing Laws ... and work from there. To say, eventually we'll have a better code of Law that we'll then
globally adapt ... and at some point that's the more regulatory basis for where we see the need to take action.
I wrote about "Strat-Os" every now and then, which I envision as a Liberation Force. The whole "Expansion Corps" ...
Frontline activity where the lines between civilian and military interests blur is focused on outreach and connectivity;
Where a primary concern is the safety of whoever wants to join.
My fiction ranges from a single agent who might cross some dangerous border to establish a connection to widespread
public euphoria over the developing new order. Like, generally I don't think that this is a population problem at all.
It's an information problem, possibly - so, we take what we can get and take it from there. But beyond that there are
cultures, or entities, that might cause problems. So, the thing we might loosely describe as "the Patriarchy", for
instance. Whatever. But I'm also watching movies, so ... in how far taking queues from those is good or bad ... it's
what I got. Guerilla Warfare, Terrorism, Capitalism ... all those things are real.
If we can break the structures that subtract choice and opportunities from the lives of those caught up in these groups
and organizations and the like ... maybe all that's left are a handful of cowards or maniacs; So, minor issues we can
narratively also swipe under the rug to keep it PG.
Leaving ... "Gideon" - a.k.a. "the so called "Greater America"" - which again ... is like, this is way too much land
for way too few people to defend it, like ... they're doing it again!
And the question: How hard is it going to get?
I mean ... at some point the problem isn't territorial but urban. But all in all ... I suppose the important part comes
down to finding a shared identity. So, to be 'human'. Not the bad type.
To not have our humanity taken from us - also.
To not allow it to get carved out from us.
And for what, even?
I mean ... to say it as it is: This is worse! At least with Racism and Nationalism you kind of have ... a point, speaking
of technology, the seeding and defense of civilization and all that - though it was really the cruelty of it that soured
people to the idea. But what is this unholy, wretched concoction that we're served today? Yea, it's in the Bible and I
hate it.
Now, how is the conflict in the middle east related to this?
Not at all? Or: How is it not?
I mean - if You're told what You're told and outside of that there isn't much else ... sure, You think - still - that
it's Your right to the land that You're claiming. But who's telling You that? Then You say ... "nobody" ... "it's what
I believe". But how? How come? How does one believe themselves to be innately superior to someone else?
See ... to be "chosen" is ... like ... whatever. The Christmas tree one puts into their Living room is "chosen". The
Turkey one cooks for Thanksgiving could be "chosen" (I'm sure there's some such thing ... somewhere). So, chosen for
what? Chosen how? I mean, I can read the words for myself; Where it goes like: This is the blessing and the curse ... .
So, what it means to me is that You have to be worthy before "Your" GOD - and in as far as You claim to be chosen, You
don't have a choice in who HE is! I mean, behind the backs You might try to be smart about it (well, I'm sure they exist),
but ... if Your GOD isn't THE God ... then I don't really care.
So, if You are worthy before Your God, Your God will take You back home and all will be fine.
That's kind of the gist of it.
What I see however is more like ... playing make-belief.
It works in the Living Room; And I suppose just by sheer brute force of cultural mechanisms ... we're like ... oppressed
by it. By the structures and the people that those structures promote. In as far as You have your hands in there ... You're
guilty! And this isn't to condemn, but as a "little reminder" ... that yea, maybe ... stop and repent!
But why would You? Well - if You're asking me like that, what is it You're asking FOR? A Gun to Your head?
Well ... that's what I'm saying! If those people exist - we kind of have to bring it to them. And the Joke is, they seem
to be more present than ever.
So, are we cool with bloodshed then or not? The argument against it seems to be that ultimately ... there's just a few that
would actually deserve it. Fine, but, how is that an argument against it then? Because ... it virtually is what I said, just
with a proverbial laugh-track laid over it.
But yea ... "tough guys" ... this is on You!
Might makes right - and ultimately - to make this thing go ... we might need a little moral support.
Which makes me wonder. What's the socio-economic status of the average soldier these days?
I mean ... as we're like gearing up for war, I have to wonder how much those soldiers are involved in any kind of
actual, real life, worthy-of-life homestead. because, that's like the crux. If You're "fighting for Love" but
have nothing, what is it that ... would snap You out of a fever dream? What is Your attachment to say ... the
concept of humanitarianism? Family. And yea, CHILDREN!
You might say to Yourself: Well, he ain't raping MY kids (yet) - but uhm, what if they don't even have kids? And
in the meantime "Girls are Mean" - like "Feminism is Evil" - so, what is this "Love" that You then fight for? The
illusion of the happy family that You don't have "because Feminism"?
I mean, arguably ... the facade of the average "picture book family" might ... pull a lot of weight, not going to
lie. And I'm not here saying that a life dedicated to God doesn't come with benefits. But ... come on! Where's the
money coming from? Where would all the other people on the planet get the finances from, to live that way? I mean,
thoughts and prayers? How?
Will it rain money? Like ... that's good for inflation?
Or will it rain food? Well, as it stands, rain is toxic now and we kind of know whom to tank for it. We can say
that it's just our own ignorance in general and to some extent that's very very true; But I also don't really feel
like taking the blame for it, you know what I mean? I mean, we all share in the burden - but if the accepted
narrative is that we bear the blame - then what about those that are actually to be blamed?
Or will God like ... magically create jobs for us? Or is it more like ... we settle, some guy with a lot of money
runs for mayor - we kind of roll with it and that's another nail in the coffin?
So yea, while technically arguing with THEM - ... I mean, maybe this is bad. Maybe I'm like ... under the influence
of some spell and I'm like ... "bound" to them in a way. Like ... Agent Smith and Neo perhaps. And they really care
to make me think that they're in control. And sure, maybe they are ... but at the end of the day - looking at this
narrative - I'm not REALLY talking to THEM here. Am I?
I mean, at the end of the day I'm saying that I don't think that words work on them.
Whoever THEY are.
Well. There is this other "they". "Us" - as it were - in as far as "we" might be a thing. And it's fair to wait and
see if there's someone ... who's already taking action. And here the question is: OK, who's behind it?
And really ... that's the crux of it. The big big ... final boss of all cruxes.
Like Israel right now. What kind of person are You, if You cheer on the extermination of a people while taking Your
resources to do so from someone like Trump? No seriously, FUCK YOURSELF!
Don't You live in enough comfort to look at this and say: Yea, maybe we shouldn't be friends with this guy!?
And yea, but this but that - sure. There's enough shit we have to get removed - so, why ... . It's politics. This idea
of ... strategy. Like, at some point it doesn't matter whether or not Trump and Putin are friends. It's functionally
the same. If we can't start to look past these things, we're forever tied up in their games.
"Whoever "THEY" Are".
Or is it?
Well, You do You. But if You're doing wrong ... don't cry about it later, when the consequences come rolling around.
Peace!
I mean, there is no complaining. HERE it is. THE answer, the way and all that. If You can't "dig it" ... how does it go?
You have to "eat shit"?
I mean, I'm under the impression that at some point we're yelling FAFO at each other - and from there it's only a tiny
step - till someone does.
Like, OK: If I have thus far been perfectly contained - and still am - I guess then YOU certainly have a much fairer point
than I would ever give YOU credit for. Else ... YOU ... are a lot more than just one person/Entity; And so ... that to me
is already like "success". I mean, a baseline thereof.
Either way ... the end is going to be the same. So, whichever way it is ... .