General Introduction:

What is Enlightenment?

For those of you that don't know - it may be some flashy experiment or religious experience. However, you then maybe care to know that ultimately 'life is life'! err ... - the thing is - ... you may wonder: When do we begin to live? And some of you may wonder: "Don't we live already?". Different oppinions and opportunities speak different languages. What does Bob Marley want to say when he sings: "I shot the sherrif"? Or what do women 'protest' about when showing their naked breast?

We all have different opinions about this and that - but when it gets to Enlightenment my experience is this: In union with God I come to experience myself in a harmony with God, well - a 'bliss' - and through exposure to it, as well as personal adjustments and stuff, it became first nature to myself. I thereby even came to realize certain drawbacks of myself in a relatable way. Thus do I therein find 'identity' - ... and a lot ultimately 'came down to' it - when thinking of different things. It is thereby however not 'clear' yet - ... entirely ... - as, between issues back and issues forth there isn't really anyone to agree or disagree - yet. (me alone)
For that ... this here is simply a 'snapshot' - of what I 'were' if those things are to become a relevant thing.

Primary Index:

Character Profile: Christopher Nikolaus(/Christina Nicole ?) Sonnberger
Clarity: Whore


Warning!




this:
>>> Main Clarity Access <<<



does not go without saying things left and right about things that matter here there and everywhere - and may be considered ... "too explicit" ... maybe ... ? What I'm concerned of is: Things can be thought about, heard about, here and there - that do in one way or another lead to echoes - which I wish to shove aside as 'background noise'. 'Sensitive' is also one way of putting it. I'm sharing myself with you - and I don't mean to draw any connections to any existing unit or entity in this world - except where I fundamentally correlate to them in union with the Most High/the Absolute/the Light; Which is primarily 'not' a superficial thing!

You can however get an impression of you'll find therein, herein/hereon.

Targetted Audience: Everyone who is interested in taking a deeper look into my psyche.


Main Issues

1. Sex Slave (Pet/Doll)

Clarification

(Log.2017.04[29-08:13]) - More than "just a thing"
    The issue concerning 'my submission' densifies around the context to 'priorities/privileges' I am allowed to have. These constitute towards cognitive growth - and are there to 'control' how much of an object I am (as 'isolated contemporary' and an 'average lifetime' thing).
    The general ambition is however to let my owner 'rape' me as he/she pleases - as true before the law, extrapolating from where I am to legally be without rights and privilege.

    This instance of the matter does converge with the other one (control of priorities) in an unfortunate way. The control of priorities is to control my general lifestyle - where 'she' is entirely in charge of how depraved I get.
    So the question is not at all 'how much she is allowed to take' - though - I'm driven to the point where I have a need to further question the scale of priorities - in a sense of adding sacrifices.

    The main thing however is, that once God has provided any priorities 'for' me - then she (my owner) is as well sortof bound to them; Where this is more along the sense of being an ordinary couple. On the other side there is the argument that if I were to actually exist in a 'proper outcome' of these things - I wouldn't have much of a purpose - as in regards to things that God might want from. Thus there is stuff 'left' - like my Programming.
    Programming is easily one of those things that helps boost my "virtual age" - as there is a lot to cognitively go into it - especially when not being part of a team. What I'm wondering about is a thing that makes it a legal requirement for her to withdraw me from certain things - as a matter of establishing certain conditions legally.
    [-> Runes and Seals]

Clarification onto Clarification

'Clarification' as a concept does have certain purposes about it that in my regard may appear as 'horrible' from an outside perspective when applied properly. In fact however does clarification thereby 'to be' matter as that, a 'cruel act' - in a sense of supporting the purpose of it.

Clarification thus I feel - generally speaking - is a purposeful 'excess' onto our clarity - excessive to a 'legal expression' of our clarities. ("What we expect").