THE FOUNDATION OF EVERYTHING (Raw Version)




THE 12 AEONS AND THE WORDS OF ORIGIN









1. THE PRINCIPLES OF LIGHT



When we look back in time, far enough, the question for what was answers itself through the figures of time that are revealed. As we see further into the past, we get an idea of what happened thereto and therefrom.
Here the question for the Origin of our Universe transcends beyond our knowledge, at the point where our knowledge ends. We know that past exists. We know it as we see that where we are today iterates on a where we were yesterday. Previously you didn't know this article exists, now you are already reading it.

How far things extend into the past is uncertain - we may say. We find that once we were born we had something like first impressions; And any memory of a previous life has been found later down the road. These first impressions are the ultimate past we know - though we can see further back, as for instance through living parents, older folks, 'relics', ... and well, civilization.
Drawing an image of the Cosmos, looking at its evolution, leads us to the Big Bang Theory. Drawing an image of what our Earth reveals, looking at its evolution, leads us to the Evolution Theory. One thing we learn thereby, is how the contemporary is a consequence to past evolutions; And that these evolutions took place, providing for future evolutions to happen. In simplicity: Everything that is, is built on something that was.
As we can see of ourselves, as born into this place, there was a time where we have not been. Reality provided for two people to exist that ultimately provided for ones self to exist. Evolution tells us that this 'law' or 'rule' hasn't always existed. First Life had to evolve to a point of organization that transcended bacterial simplicity - introducing 'organic growth' and ultimately leading to self-replication through sexual intercourse.
Even so the stars themselves have a lifespan. Looking into the vastness of the sky we see Stars getting born, stars decaying and remnants of stars of which some are more and others less present in the Universe. The temperature-zone we call 'the Habitable Zone around a Star' - being the foundation for Life as we know it - exists around any star that is Hot enough; And is created through its Heat.

Speaking of that which did set things in motion, my interpretation of the Big Bang Facts is ultimately that it is an incident caused by substance interacting with physical laws - yet; Expanding on that, as looking further into the past, requires us to gain a more fundamental understanding about this substance and those laws.
These Laws, to our Understanding, are absolute. They are not like matter in that they could 'wear off' - though, if they do we haven't developped an understanding for that yet. But lets skip on the details and get to the raw Understanding of Everything!



A - the principal cornerstone of the eternity

Before I was baptized I was wondering about the Origins of Everything. I had a strange idea - for some reason I kept looking for an understanding of the beginning ... and my conclusion was 'that time passes by'. I didn't know - nor was I vastly or even remotely concerned about it - whether it was right to think that way; So - its technically been some delusive idea of some kind. In hindsight I figured that what I arrived there was the to my understanding most 'rudimentary' existential insight. And I understand that I didn't have a 'potent' understanding of thoughts and their nature. I didn't understand their inherant power - not perfectly realizing how 'the visible' is equally 'the thought'. So I expanded on that theory quasi implying something that later should turn out to be true, but still somewhat different.
And I nowhere really related to it as 'the Word'.

The first tool I basically received - some time thereafter; I was baptized already - from scriptures was the line "Once upon a time nothing existed but THE Existing One" (apocryphic - the Apocalypse of James (NHC)). The second Volume that adds to this is 'the Apocryphon of John' (NHC); And is for the most part containing the most part of what this writing focusses on. A third one should however not be forgotten! 'The Tripart Tractate' (NHC) as being the more elaborate part of who or what 'THE Existing One' is.


"The Father is a Wholesomeness/Unit/Unity/Union, as the Number One, for he is the First, and that which he is, is nobody else". The text there continues with "But yet he is not a being for himself. Could he else be Father?" - and that is where I have to discuss a few things about the Nag Hammadi Codices to you. When read with the right Understanding, most of the things are basically self-explaining; Which means - yea - almost as if there were no flaw in those writings. But depending on "where we are" in our lifetime, basic concepts just don't work out. That is were we would/should start to 'stroke out' what we don't or can't understand - until we are left with a comprehensive text.
Prior to Baptism and prior to Unification certain things just cannot be understood. If I describe Baptism to someone who is Baptised, I can describe it in such a way that relates to the experiences that came along. And yea, the holy/right baptism is different to others! I wasn't really all up into getting Baptized (Mormonism) after I had been baptized by a Friend and "scared off" of a Seventh Day Adventist one. (I was scared off in that I was worried and believed in Gods compliance once asking him to somehow cancel it in case it'd be wrong; And then things happened, climaxing in the teachers/instructors upsetness shouting that he cannot baptize me under these circumstances (and all we did was arguing about doctrine))
I can talk of an inner peace, like a Paradisic Universe blowing through my mind like wind, a taste of salvation, a crisp, ... Light - something you just can't verify if you're not having it. It comes when letting go of all concerns and worries, relaxing, and breathing in these 'particles of Light' that are as ... mmmmmmh ... 'coming' like a Drug.

To get to the Father, so is the Christian 1x1, we need Christ. The reason is simple!: If there is a God, we need to be told by Him of the things that came before us. In this expression Christ is a synonym for the long long pasts transcendence into our scope. Here we want to go as far back as possible - beyond the spectrum of our Universe if necessary. And so we get to the expression: 'Once upon a time there was nothing but the existing one'; And if we say nothing we mean it. In the logic of evolution, this is the most basic principle - as we can say: Existence itself. And the Apocryphon of John tells us that a spark of Light, 'the first insight', somehow happened within something; And that this insight grew until it was ultimately labelled 'Christ' - next to which we read about 3 principles, 4 Lights and 12 Aeons.

"For whence there is a Father, so it concludes, that there also is a Son. But the only one, who is alone Father, is a Root with Stem, Twigs and Fruits. It is said of him, he is Father in the truest sense of the Word. He is namely of unmistakable Kind and unchangable, he is alone Lord and God. Nobody is his God, and nobody is his Father.
For not-created is he, nobody has procreated him, nobody has made him. Whence else someone is Father or Creator, so does he on his part have a Father and a Creator. Of course is such someone Father and Creator of that, that has come into Life through him oder has been made by him. But he is therefore not Father in the actual Sense and certainly not God. For there is someone, who has created or made him on his part.
In the actual Sense is Father and God only the one, whom nobody else has created." (the Tripart Tractate)

That something wherein this first insight happened now is Spirit - or Mind, Consciousness - whatever it is that 'can' have an insight. If we now want to speak about Fathers and Creation and God, we have to speak about the ability to conceive, to reason and to make. And if we conclude that God is the one whom nobody has made - we conclude that he has existed in a time ...

"Concerning the Universe, so is he the one, who has procreated and made it. He is without Beginning and End. And not only without End is he - as he is immortal, because he is not created -, but he is also unchangable in his eternal Duration, his always continuing way of being what he is, in his Foundation therein, what defines his Majesty. Wether will he ever be less, than he is, nor can anyone force him, to aspire for a goal, that he himself doesn't want. As there is nobody, who would have made a beginning to his life." (the triparte tractate)

Now - where would go and start striking out lines? What we get there as 'reasons' to certain claims aren't direct conclusions - but things that have been written conclude into them already. At the end, there however still are these claims - and if you believe in Christ, you believe in what we have from him; And so you believe that he is 'the Christ' who speaks of the Origin of Everything. That Origin is the Father.
'The Existing One'. The one who was and is and ever will be. The Root of Existence beholding its own self and creating the Paradoxon of Time.
The reason why we are having this discussion on a fundamental Level is to point out how Existence 'is' Eternity - as inherantly required for anything to actually be. Existence as we know it is bound to time; And the Gospel of John reads: "In the beginning there was the Word, and the Word was God".
So, what is Existence? What is at its base? Its root?



B - the quantum reality of Light

What follows is going a bit into physical science. I would have deleted it - it somehow doesn't fit in - but I kindof have a bad feeling on deleting it. So, I'll leave this here and conclude thereafter.
The Quantum Reality of Light - as observed by Scientists - teaches us a lesson about Reality in general. It says that Light itself isn't a particle - but a wave 'function', and once 'reality' expects the function to return a statement regarding the 'photons' position, it is created - thus becoming a particle. Now - without obscure science bla bla, lets take a step away from the physics themself and talk about the core principles themself.

The emphasis for once is on 'function'. The 'double slit experiment' shows that if Light is sent through two slits - the result is 'not' that we see 'two' illuminated areas as one per slit, but that the illuminated areas reveal a wave pattern in which a wave function for each slit combines into a higher 'probability' of the particle being on a central illuminated area, and less probable the further the function fans out. Using Light Detectors it was found that the Light no longer moved through that slit as a wave, but as particle.
So - this experiment requires the slits to be small and close to each other - which is because Light does still have a relative size.
What 'function' means is that there is a mathematical foundation at the root of existence to a Light Particle for instance. In theory we can so describe a perfect Light Source as a dot sending out an impulse into all directions. If we then arranged an array of double-slits spherically around that source so that the impulse passes all slits at once - and turned half of the detectors on - we wonder if the Light were to more likely pass through the "open" or through the "closed" slits - or if its even.
But the point is, we get 1 particle per impulse, somewhere on the illuminated 'target' - effectively dispensed symmetrically around the sphere. The difference to how Light really works - in the observed spectrum - is that I impose something I come to now call a 'Quantum Identity/Entity' - which concludes as: "As each particle-wave passes through both slits, the visible superposition indicates a 'co-equivalent' dependency on previous 'hits' - producing the effect of visible probability. These however are difficult to account for as we observe what we expect: A per-chance manifestation as we can see in a visibly random occurance of particles. It Clutters, but ultimately it pans out. In the wave images we see the product of mathematical wave interaction of basically two sources that still function as one. This, note: Is on base of a single photon. What we expect to see at any rate, if we took time-framed images, is an arbitrary occurance of impacts where each perceived cluttering is an arbitrary effect of the frame taken. If we would make a pen to draw with, that also recorded what it drew from its own perspective, we would still expect to see the same dispersion of Light as we follow the tip of the pen. Adjusting the Lights frequency would change the pattern we receive. Adding a detector to a slit would allow us to remove its interferance with the wave. What I so call the 'Light Entity' projects onto the entire width of possibilities - and as the interference pattern disappears when moving the Light through detectors shows that there is a 50:50 chance for it to have passed through either of the two, following the particles respective motion vector. With detectors off, the single pulse shatters around the slits - iterating 'the functional awareness' of the particle into a higher degree of interference. A 3-Dimensional 'target' would certainly proove to be interesting. Another idea of what a Quantum Entity is can however be fetched from what is a 'Bose-Einstein condensate', or simply put: Quantum Level Compound. Generally we speak of a scope of Physics that overrides physics in that it declares the existence of things prior to their physical presence. This scope also provides us with a solution for physical problems that require us to narrow the understanding down into a mathematical concept. Black Holes for instance 'transcend' reality in that we primarily recognize them through the numbers. Perhaps Black Holes are sub-space explosions - or space-time 'im'plosion, saying that gravity pulled matter so densely together that the mathematical concept of them translates into a negative expansion, creating a 'rift' in space-time where the 'negative explosion' 'sucks' spacetime into the negative expanse, where the physical reality now 'falls' into it creating a constantly growing pull - as far as matter is available - as for instance blowing up a baloon. Once all mass has been consumed; And it sticks there not growing further, we're speaking of a sink-hole that swallowed up space-time; Alias 'the blown up baloon'. If it grows even without mass, then we're speaking of a serious rift that expands following an internal physical function. Including the 'principle of decay' however, 'finite reality', 'absolute limits', we can add a few 'buts' to that condition. When speaking of an explosion we speak of expansion over time - conditioning the 'effective tear' in space time that now functions as vacuum that actively propells the expansion maybe. When thinking about possible results we might find star-black-hole hybrids - as mass that 'rests' on a 'full' black hole ... uh, weird. ... When thinking about the effective surface of a Black Hole, the collision between the two becomes interesting.
Speaking of Light however, these 'rifts' are 'deep' enough to swallow up Light. It is said that Light isn't affected by Gravity - but bent through crumbled space-time, which occurs around a star. So the Black Hole we can see 'bends the Light' around itself, leaving a 'Black Hole' in the center. The Light that is being bent are particles - or waves. Once impacting on solid matter however, they are particles. If two Black Holes come together, so I've seen in reports on simulations, they show signs of two cores for yet a pretty long time. It is now up to us to basically imagine what 'the other side' looks like - ..." but I digress.

The emphasis is on the Light having a "non-particular" existence, one that rules its 'particular' (he/lol!) existence 'in'.
To establish from there, we see how reality is governed within a mysterious superform, "Quantum Reality" we say, which helps us express 'Fields' as individual fibres of space-time that function themself in relativity to 'the continuum' as relative space time affecting 'Quantum Entities'. So do Higgs Boson and Higgs Field constitute 'Mass'. The Higgs Field is a 'phase' of 'the continuum' that Governs matter as connected to Higgs Bosons. The Field has an influence on the Bosons that in themself have an influence onto the material they are a part of, thus constituting - well, whatever it is they constitute. When speaking of mass and gravity - we speak of Higgs. In some way. The Mathematical figures we perceive are hereby properties of the Field/Continuum - and these we conceive as the establishing reality of the cosmos. As we get nourished, our metabolism grows and provides our brain with energy that our blanks spirit grows upon.
It conceives those impulses - establishes a 'world view' - and learns how to convert internal impulses into expressions.
We see something Quantum-Real-ish going on. Our mind acts as one - it consumes information, reflects upon priorities; And is capable of focussing around the own physical existence, or at least biological needs and social metaphysics. "At least" - because - these are two fundamental concepts of our existence. Shame however ... that opens up a third concept of existence: self-awareness.
Shame is something we experience in resonance to a Light, which is like a Field to which we are Quantum Entities. Its effect is that we cover our intimacy - and an understanding of respect emerges from mutual acknowledgements of privacy.

When being young, we act like an arbitrary Light Source. Our actions don't quite follow a real idea when expected to react. As we grow older we however learn to 'focus' - thus channeling our physical body into a specified form - as subject to our higher interest. We develop habits to 'ease' our navigation through every-day life, as also inherantly growing muscles(/"mimics") to deal with regular situations.
We grow in perspective upon life - and ultimately continue to seek our own self in it - to whatever extent, be it interests or whatever; What how so ever emerges from the individuals awareness of existence. So do Martial Arts or Meditative Sports (Tai Chi(inner martial arts)/Yoga) - Tai Chi/... especially - conclude into Forms that are learned through mimicing a routine and carried into the mind for it to optimize the motions in interest of harmony. (-> Tai Chi). Gravity and Physical Balance become factors - as does the internal power to distribute Force throughout the System to achieve these Forms. Not only is it power, but in the opposite direction it so is relaxiation - chanelling physical energy as subjected to higher consciousness and controlling the body through feeding into it. Practice improves this situation in that the Form is repeatedly imposed onto the Body through which it (the Form) also grows in experience factors (that are/is the perceived feedback related to the activity channeled into the awareness of their motion).
Yoga does the same while however focussing on the strength of one expression rather than the flow of them.

Its after all however still simple to just take a Form and impose it onto the Body; While Dancing - Dancing eventually is that, but also something different. Its either arbitrary and sporadic, or it is arbitrary and focussed. Sometimes more arbitrary than focussed, and other times arbitrary until a form was found. Then dancing is more flow and action - thus being more physical fitness than meditation.
What Tai Chi is to serve is to expand the time - providing a very long and diverse tradition of practice to scoop from - following motions that demand spiritual activity and can be executed very slwoly without loosing the 'intended effect'. That is what we see or get when trying to do "classical Kung Fu Stances" just slowly. 'Faster Stances', sotospeak, focus on physical conditions where speed is more relevant at all - thus being entirely different; Different Logic, different purpose.

Whatever now translates our minds activity into physical action can thereby perceived as at the root of our intention. Thinking of Kung Fu or Dancing, that intention 'discharges' into motions, constituting a flow of discharges establishing a Form over time sotospeak. Yoga on the other end the intention imposes a singular Form unto the Body - some for instance specifically leaned against physical Limits thus effectively constituting menthal dominance. Tai Chi neds a very specific 'pacing' - which is evident. Somewhere between the Minds Speed of growing and technical motionlessness, the aspiring Tai Chi Master seeks the advise of the Trainer and takes it slow. And so the first thing I learned was a stance - basically standing, but a specific kind of standing. With the knees slightly bent and the entire rest relaxed yet held at a forward looking stability puts body and mind into a crunch-zone. Intetion/Willpower has to be assembled in order to keep the stance that imposes the all over demand to relax. It was said that once taking it seriously one will have to do that for a Month before learning the first motions. I guess it is however fair to introduce you to the 'first and final' motion - where you turn the inside of your hands forward, and move them in a far circle sideward above your head breathing in, where you turn them downward and push/move them slowly downward while breathing out. If you there-after just move one, lets say your left, foot a bit further to the side - you can right away experience the first next basic motion. The further you want to move it, keeping it slowly - and so you can also try the other way - the more imbalance has to be counterbalanced. Repeating it you may want to omit the first part of the motion - moving the hands up - and just focus on the moving them down part to focus onto the transition. What I call 'bad ki' is thereby ultimately broken once trying to get as far out as possible by simply moving the hips 'left', and expressively moving the Legs to yield the highest possible impact. Try to move it down first - which is as I call it, 'breaking the bad kharma'. If you want to go further do, while performing that step, cross your wrists, right arm on body side, insides facing outward, and move them to to the top, left front of your forward vision.
And the reason why this is legit is because it is that simple, but not quite how it works. Tai Chi begins without a lot of stepping off balance; And is generally aimed at Harmony. But anyway ... - you can follow your own fancy I guess - keep it simple, try to keep a regular breath and gain speed once you like to; But once learning a solid form you get the most out of it.
And visiting a school should help practicing it regularly and especially for a minimum forced duration - plus having a social side to it from where professional advise should prove to be helpful.

The Form ultimately resembles menthal control - and the energy we 'have' to control it is what we would call 'Ki' (when pronounced CHi its 'Qi'). It seems to manifest anywhere throughout our body - but mainly in the so called 'Dan Tian' (in our hibs, like two fingerbreadths beneath the navel) - while our mind effectively releases signals to the muscles, relative to the strength of our will, to the intended Form. There are even so called 'effects of the Form' - which indicate that when the ki energy is moved in perfect harmony with the physical discharge a certain warmth can be perceived for instance; Being one indicator for ki being still something abit more substancial.
In essence it is capable of over-riding physical stability - which by the way is how we suppose energy is channeled into the muscle.
This in hindsight takes the question for mind-body relations one bit further, in that there is Ki - for once directly united with our intention and then as ultimately in control over the body. And so does the brain function as direct medium to our mind, though the body functions as container to its transcendental nature.


So - what have we learned? We have learned of Light and how there is something above Light - as we have learned that there is the human mind that also is somehow above something. We can take this Yoga Stance, where we spread fingers apart while touching the middle finger with the thumb and holding that touch to the sides of our ears as general expression for that truth. And an intentionally different one to counter "the toxic effect" of falling subject to it; Like pressing both hands against each other in front of the chest.
There is 'one' - yes: ONE - general flaw in this writing which basically makes me loose my head about it. And well, we're still under this headline, so, we continue our odysee into learning more about the Light (learning something wrong is learning too if you figure out the error!). When entering a discussion - I realized - we kindof need to know what we are dealing with. Someone once tried to communicate that point to me, but I didn't get it, kindof. I mean - what can I do? What can anyone do? I mean - the matter we're dealing with is weird. 'Whom' you enter a discussion with is maybe not that important; But - the simplest way to put it is, imagine that only Antichristians would read this. I could argue all the way I want; Their commentary doesn't even have to make sense because if they all stick to their plot it isn't gonna matter. I mean - "whom am I trying to convince?". Or 'they' - for that matter.

How that relates to the Light? In the section above I've been getting into 'focus' - and if we have a clear objective we can so channel "our Light" into straight directions. Our mind is however not only output; And so, in a discussion, we are supposed to interact. People can now ask questions or denie understanding 'intentionally' - which means, they can 'hook you off' the truth. And so the one big flaw in this segment above. Its where I introduced 'Quantum Entities'. The problem is that 'what is above the Light' sotosay - it doesn't really figure. But its there. So you can believe it or disbelieve it ... and because that entire mess feels like growing totally out of control I wanted to delete it. Seriously, its actually just something someone can make a whole lot of noise about - 'hooking' the conversation into a growing emphasis on that one thing; But - I guess you still got the point. How can we 'make it' - 'real'?
Isn't that the whole entire problem?
Or is this really just read by Antichristians and the weird energies I perceive aren't actually people trying to legitimately dig this - but are trying to scavage my writings for things they can use in their un-godly things?

Its evident that I don't 'know' that. How could I? I mean - how could I 'know'? You must 'know' that knowledge is specifically different to thought, belief and theory. Not to the point that you can't denie or "unwield" knowledge - like, if I slapped you in your face that would create knowledge, knowledge you could yet try to believe doesn't exist. Like the whole Matrix stuff, just different. So - instead of writing about the Light, I figure I should write about Shadow - because the Light of this World is just a shadow of the real one.


Quite literally even, if we say that the particles are Light; And the wave-form is the real one; Hence the Light we see is just a shadow of the Quantum World. I guess this makes it way easier.

And I do believe that the few lines I wrote in conclusion to the thing on top is enough to get you on various tracks; Which is the point. So, I'm not gonna take you by the head to explore each and every stinking corner of the Universe (You-niverse).


But othersie, more legitimately speaking of this world as of a shadow to the higher reality, the point are laws and physics. If we want to speak of 'the real world' - 'reality as it is' - the first approach here was to speak of the past; Trying to peek beyond 'the Bubble that is our Universe'. Silently lingering therein are forms that try to pronounce the opposite - to think about the Beginning first.
The 'true Light' in this sense is 'how reality works actually' - where I say that physical Laws are 'not it'. OK - they work of course, but they aren't everything. Well, they are "everything" when keeping it to this dark bubble we call our Universe - but it is evident to me and so it should be to you that there is something, some ONE higher.



C - A sync between belief and reality

a.k.a. "Reality Check". I'm not made for this. I mean - I am only here to introduce you into the concept of the 3 Principles, the 4 Lights and the 12 Aeons; Though I don't want to say that I believe that I'm not doing a good job. Maybe it needs a little bit of work to make it perfect - but yea. Saying that I am not made for this doesn't exclude my ability to communicate my minds content to you - more or less.
And so I'm getting from one topic to the other - and as I do so, and as you follow up - there is that fundamental question of what you 'expect'. Do you expect something specific? Or do you expect to get lectured, to be told what to do and what to think? However 'you' want to see it specifically may not be the same as others do - and yet does this attitude require me to adapt. Its crucial that this message doesn't really 'exclude' anyone - but so ultimately there is time; And once you have comprehended 'enough' you will be capable of speaking for yourself. Yea well - the same can happen if what I wrote as bogus - but so could my claim regarding how the Matrix stuff came together be nonsense. You won't however truely 'know' - oh yea, I forgot about that - until - you know. If you know its a thing, well, I guess thats however 'enough' for the general terms.

I cannot know how these impressions I'm getting relate to reality because they are impressions. In essence these impressions are like someone talking to me - and I can so choose to believe that talk or not; Just that it isn't a pronounced, comprehensive talk. There is stuff going on - and maybe I'm just seeing possibilities. I so far had the chance to get 'knowledge' regarding various things - like, sometimes I anticipate things for a given reason; But well - I can't get these anticipations on my own will - and its like I'm not supposed to proof to you that I have some ability there. I believe many folks have abilities - I believe the Antichristians have some degree of superpowers; And maybe even that Hitler won World War 2. This belief however takes me into a grim perspective of reality as it is - but it figures; However not without considering the Light. Yet - am I seeing it right or am I biased?
After all, all those questions don't matter once the 'common sense goal' is in sight!
Doesn't it?


There is a good trade-back to the science segment not really working out - adding to the core idea that I'm not trying to convince you by argument or bright elaborations or anything of that sort that you basically also can find everywhere else on the internet regarding different or similar subjects. Really: The ability to explain things is - ... yea, a relative to the ability of finding excuses! I mean: Flat Earth, the faked Moon Landing, Hollow Earth ... Nibiru, New World Order, Giants, Angels, Interdimensional Gateways, Alien Bases on the Moon, ... HAARP - ooOK - I mean, not everything that sounds like Bullshit 'is' Bullshit.

So - well, I guess it isn't too obvious to not say it, though ... well - the thing is: Be aware that, or, learn, know, understand, 'compile' - that the ability to believe isn't exclusive to the Truth!


And so is 'disbelief'!
And that is why everything up unto (not including) Unification with God is ... well ... "shady" - and for once it isn't the way that is the goal; And this is very important. So - there are a lot of words here and every now and again some of them are more important than others.
Well, expressions. So the word 'word' wasn't one of them. When imagining this whole sea of words as a machine - there is that one mechanical element it all comes down to - lets imagine something where electric current is transferred through the air. So - I mean, it makes no sense. But the image explains itself. So, its the whole point of the machine that there is that current floating through the air. While that machine would show something about electricity or whatever, this one - it well, it 'targetted' at people who aren't unified yet (yea, uhm, "duh" ...) - and this isn't just one of the not so important important things; Its like the main attraction of the show; Although; You need to know stuff, like, where electricity comes from and stuff like that.
We can so hearken back to the quantum reality of Light issue - where a conclusion I have is: A very general problem with trying to deduce God from the physics we're in is the nature of trying to deduce essential perfection through a system of decay.
We can see it so: The best way to deduce essential perfection through a system of decay is through understanding the nature of decay and ... essentially dreaming of a better world. Yea - perhaps thats whats so great about alcohol.

So yea - you can go and explain something - why this is all wrong; But - you can grow through these if they come your way. Listen to it, but don't only nod - try to understand what these explenations tell you. Dealing with half-truths is totally easy if you know what you are doing and essentially this knowledge 'should' be common sense - while it is however not (yet). When it gets to things about religion you can take a side-step and just think about how all (false) reasoning either takes your attention onto things that are either rooted in this world; Or something totally beyond. Be it logic that is "beyond comprehension" or whatever. And there really isn't a mid-way; Just a third way, a third extreme: things rooted in yourself! When I tell you that you have to account for the possibility that God exists (no matter how much you already believe) - and pray to Him on that Basis - you'll receive that Testimony; You can choose to believe it or not! Naturally. You can also choose to believe that this Testimony comes from somewhere else. I choose to believe - I was getting to it but somehow I couldn't find the right words considering I only had a few to say what I meant to at that particular point; ... - that 'THE' God is the Origin of Everything and Superceding everything truely. That means: There is no power in existence that can override Gods desire and ability to tell you the Truth!
When He does - he however prefers to have a gain from it - so, that you'll understand! I mean - have you ever encountered God doing something for you - in that regard? I mean - lets say: "God, if you exist, send us a sign!" - and something happened. But then you, I supposed, were somewhat stunned at first, paralyzed, as afterwards telling yourself that this sign wasn't strong enough for you to let go of your doubts. So you might want to try that again but nothing happens. Well - thats, well, just the way He is! And in that we can learn that God does have Character. He is, in some sense, predictable. For once predictable through the right logic - since God is a truely logical being; As we are, just ... well ... more perfect and stuff; (Though we can technically argue about 'the perfection' when it gets to nature - still, His eternal nature is simply something we can never achieve!); But also because He's 'loving' - 'caring' - as, these are the words that come to my mind when I think about this "stubborn" behaviour (or strict). Th 12th Season of Two and a Half man is really interesting to watch - as, regarding parenthood. Allen and Walden adopted a Child - and their way of dealing with it is kindof ... enlightening we might say. It deals with those things parents might know all too well, but it also touches the right topics - for a, well, actually quite stupid comedy show.


Your best, low faith cost, bet might just be "passive learning". As Jesus said that we can tell mountains to move and they will if we have enough belief - it is still God who does the moving - didn't/don't know/understand that? Well, thats what we're yet getting to in the things below; Where I want to be more open about what it means that the 9th Seal sortof explains it all; But here - lets just say: God imposes the criteria for us, 'when' our belief is strong enough and so; He knows better than we do just how much faith we got! Yea - it is kindof weird that God doesn't directly tell you once you're sortof trying yourself on more than you can handle - but maybe that is just because "you" don't think about that! In the end - the Jeremiah 31 Prophecy (starting with verse 31, but I mean verse 34) tells us that we won't lecture each other about God anymore because we'll all know him! And so - imagine the world around us all of a sudden changing to the better. I mean, yea, how would it? Certainly something would have to cause that change. And as people run around praising God - not just speaking of Judgement Day and Sin and Repentence - you'll "see" God. And it'll be just a wonderful thing!

But don't get this the wrong way. I for my part have better things to do - and partially its also an issue of 'style' or ... 'respect' - than running around shouting Haleluyah. But I'm not trying to hide the facts of my belief either!



D - In conclusion

Just thinking about the Light didn't really help us to 'that point' - as we see, Light is just a shadow, yet - so; To really get to 'that point' we have to think some way else.




2. THE PRINCIPLES OF LIFE



Existence is Life - can you dig that? Well - from a scientific standpoint we have to say: "Uhm, nope!" - because "the Universe" "tells us" that there have been things way before Life came into existence. But science that does ignore that Existence IS Life, does ignore something very fundamental to our reality. Organic Life - yea - sure - is certainly - not that!

So - lets just start with the 3 Principles: Life, Thought and Will. At this point you can replace Life with Existence - its the same thing. Existence is a conscious matter. Like Math. Math Exists and we cannot tell - well - how it could actually not exist! Its a weird thing. 1+1=2. Its Universal Truth. Even if nothing existed - it were still true - but that anything exists for that truth to actually matter - that is that kind of thing about Existence that matters here.
So - when we talk about mind and spirit - we know our own. We can't or don't understand how a mind or spirit could uphold the vastness of the Universe (and at the same time be a legitimate "Person") - but here's the Glitch: If we believe that we ourselves are Eternal - just as I/we say God is - we don't see it! We can't! Or we end up believing that some higher power took that ability from us.
Similar though somewhat different is - well - what happens/happened because I've written about a particular dream I've once had. In that dream I confronted an evil force, arrived at some pillar/column, pushed against it a little and it began to crack. Then I said that within 48 hours it would explode. So - whatever the point has been - now it happens that whenever I upload something people wait for like 48 hours to see if something explodes or, if I upload "the thing". Totally forgetting that what I uploaded might just help them anyway!
Kindof.

So there again would be that perplexity. But the 48 hours could also just be the time it takes for you to actually take advantage of what I've written! So yea - as by matter of thought: A delayed explosion!
Yet - I believe that me being serious about these 'stupid' things here will let later generations understand that we have actually been really 'that' stupid! And so they'll take it more seriously - and the 'hints' for that are quite there, at all time! We aren't perfect - and since we live in a world thats effectively trying to make us believ all and everything but the divine truth - yea, there is no Light; And we think we're as smart as it gets! Well, we are - we won't be smarter then at least, at least in some regard - but we just don't have the; OK, through this it'll change a little to the better; 'tools' to think about, the right information to handle. I found myself writing things and just kindof "expecting" that you'd understand what I'm getting at; But certainly, I can't extend beyond my capabilities either!

Don't believe that I'm seeing things right? If I tell you the core principles of it all - as I did again and again - whats your take on it? XD - yea - OK, "what" Core principles? I've learned a lot by reading and thinking alone - so I could tell you "the truth is out there" - you just have to find it! So - where you go? I found it, it was kindof easy, so, why would you not? But the truth is: It has been out there for quite some time - and nobody really seems/seemed to get it!
But if we lived in a world where the truth of everything is valued - really - I can say "the truth is out there" and people won't have a big problem finding it! Really!

Yea - so - the 'doubt' that crosses us up here, well, someone in the future could for instance argue; Once the presence of the Light is totally obvious and everywhere; That its unthinkable, that it couldn't be this bad! That would work as those people don't have a concept of what its like to exist totally without it!


The three principles mean that they are a perfect, 100% 'definition' of everything that there is in 'Reality' (well, so to a mind that has no concept of Eternity being something that has to be considered something special). We may go and believe that God isn't unique - that there are many like Him - but "wherein" are they? What is the nature of the thing they exist in? That is the "traditional" 'taking the next step further' technique. You just don't try to answer anything unless you're there at the 'end point' - at least not once thinking about what is beyond our knowledge and comprehension; Or so: God. And that is how we come to believe that it is true!
Technically the first born human being - so, the first human individual ever created - 'is' what we might call Zeus; Where Chronos evidently is a thing higher than us; Or Lucifer even - depending on what kind of stuff we're thinking of. What I mean - or what the Gospel "means" - is that we are, in reality, as close to being like God as it gets! We're free! And everything that is - is either like us, or less than us, in that regard. Angels are less than us. They exist to fulfill a given purpose, like programs.
That is why God wants us to know Him as Father - as Family member. To some extent the things I'm writing about here have all been clear to me from the get go. It was like "snap, there!" - so I thought that mentioning the principles, lights and aeons real quick would do the same to those that'd read about them. But so, I did yet have a lot to learn; Though as I've been done with L.A. - my time there could essentially be called a trip to solve some final riddles about "the things" - I felt like, and for the most part that feeling was accurate, there wasn't anything/a-lot left to learn!
But anyway - be that as it may!

So - lets think about it: Life, Thought and Will. You know you have them! You Live, you have thought and you have will. They all belong together. You cannot separate thought from wanting! You have to think and want simultaneously to do the respectively other. And of course - these things 'exist'. Or you have a 'self' that 'is' Life. You might want to think that you also have a soul - but try to not include things you're not perfectly aware/sure of! I mean: What is a soul? Could it be just a thought? A wanting? I believe that if you try to undo the believe that the soul is something that can be 'taken' (well, except it is being 'deceived' ...) - or something 'extra' or somehow significant - you'll find peace in the understanding I try to submit here. So - lets think about it! If you have a soul - what does it do? If you describe the soul to be that which leaves your body once you die - it is your 'spirit' as far as my point of view tells me!
The spirit has life, thought and wanting - or 'is' - they all belong together - and what else do we need?

So, how about the 4 Lights? Substance, Perception, "Spiritual Muscle" and an Understanding? The 'original' terms are slightly different. Substance is called Mercy/Grace and "Spiritual Muscle" is called Level-Headedness. And Substance/Mercy/Grace is really that substance of imagination, or: Of 'perception'. It comes together. What you see in your imagination is that substance, that the substance is being perceived is perception!

These 4 Lights are as much 'Reality' as the 3 Principles - just on a different plane of observation or reasoning. They are properties of the Spirit - and so the game goes on to say that they are also properties of God! Firstly they are properties of God! We just have the same because we are 'of' that same substance.
But we're also inherantly different. We're limitted. As a general matter its called 'the Mangle'. The Mangle is however something that I believe is something that I don't really understand all that much about - I feel like there is a lot more than I can even think of right now/imagine.
The gist however is that it is somewhat the consequence of free spirit not being Eternal. There is a fundamental 'lack' we have compared to Eternity - as we are also inherantly incapable to fully understand it! To our reasoning it doesn't/cannot exist - we simply cannot produce the insight or experience of Eternity because our minds, well, simply can't! Our perception is limitted to our limitted nature - so - to 'perceive' the reality of Eternity we would have to be Eternal!

So we may wonder: "Can it even be?" - but similarly we can wonder: "Can anything actually be?".

And now we do live in this "smashingly perfect" world - regarding its ways, how everything works - and we're sortof incapable of grasping it; Like its too much! Too much for us to believe that it can actually be real! So, once might take a look at Quantum Mechanics and point out that the flaws of God become visible therein - but ... please!


Yea - why was Neos first thought; Regarding the Architects description of "the Mother"; That its the Oracle? Simply because the Oracle was the next best bet he had. We learn of paradigms and we have to apply them - its so kindof Logical that its the oracle because its the only main Character in the story 'large enough' to fit that description of importance!
"Evil" has a gain however, from keeping us inside our own little Boxes - simply enough because it makes us extremely foolable! But enough with that.



Oh - Upgrades! Yea, it seems the balance has shifted. Now I guess it'll be so that the "common consensus" will be sought in the fact that I'm blabbering too much about stuff like the Matrix and things; And not telling you more things you don't know about Eternity!

"Eternity is an Equilibrium" - oh dude! Can I cry out for Help? Not that its hard to counter; It just ... hurts ... after some time! And that pain is real! It feels like stepping on sun-heated metal barefoot - just 'on the brain' however.

And its really a thing! I can't get that pain out of my head/brain either! Could it be just the summer though? That I don't drink enough cold stuff? But well - it gets to me every now and again and ... truely sorry, its ... not a pleasant feeling however!

But I can try and believe that I'm the one mistaken here. Not that it wouldn't matter the same way - so - I however don't have the time to write even more - and time matters in that I have my own conscious growth going on. I guess its even true that I've forgotten more than you effectively know! I take it as Gods way of telling me to calm the fuck down! I was really pedantic on these things and to some degree still am; But essentially He just spammed me with information and insight and inspiration - keeping me busy until its just been too much; And that quite literally. Its not like: Oh, I wanna play a game now - too bad God! - it already is like, well, I'm working on three writings right now - having already delayed others for later, while I'm also still trying to make progress on my software. And now starting over again and compiling this into a more condensed version ... I can't! But thats just an internal muscle thing - its so that its not even an issue; A failsafe we might say.
Well, is Eternity an Equilibrium? Well, our Minds are Equilibria too! So - WTF!

I however don't see a gain from making such things largely important! You're supposed to get into Unification with God - and then, well, you "have it" - "right there" - better than words can tell; As it won't need words to tell!

The things I'm writing about here aren't of that kind. I try to reflect on the knowledge, reasoning and understanding of Unification and how stuff ties in. The 12 Aeons are important - and that because by learning them as 'how God is' - and you then getting into Unification through acknowledging that - because its a part of the ritual thing - you get a confirmation of it. Though, it is less of a confirmation but more like a - ... well, starting point. It more so allows you to have a tight concept of the things you'll come to perceive! 'Will' might be something intangible to you, and so thoughts. But one of the first things that mattered to me, for instance, is that I could 'feel' the world around me. It 'enhanced' reality in some supernatural way; And will and thought - they appear in that same kind of "thing" ... 'feeling' ... 'force' ... and so you'll know: OK, 'Mercy/Grace' ... 'Perception' ... stuff! OK!



To some extent I will however say: "it explains everything" is enough; And it won't get better than that because there are things that are explained/evident therethrough that I can't possibly convey to you in words! Lets just say that you now have doubts and that they will just vanish! You may believe that I just am/was not as critical as you - but yea, LOL - ... I believe you're just being naive there!
Its as you would expect - kinodf - sticking to the things you can't disclose to yourself right now (prior to that)!

Certainly there will be (are?) people running around claiming that its a scam - but you can either choose to believe them; Or God once you have a Testimony!



By the way: For the future I believe that letting people play a Multiplayer (video!) game where the opponents are Cheating to win is a good enough lesson that doesn't go too far! It teaches people about these steps they just can't climb, closed doors they just can't open!



...



A - on and off topic

Yea, actually this whole part has been completely random, and this sub-headline could also just read: "A - random headline" - yea, lol! But so the Principles and the Lights aren't really that big of a deal. So far this part has been like compensation; There's a lot of stuff spinning around in my head - and since the first part ... well, lets say, I think this is a good opportunity to mash some things together as to have them in one spot rather than to scatter them into many subtopics convulated by major points. The next part is going to be different, I guess, since the 12 Aeons deserve something more "serious".

However - I would also suggest that the big benefit of this; The hopes and what not; Thats gonna come by 'you' - its, my ho... you'll notice that ... well, lets sa ... y - ... uhm ... what ... uhm, sorry.


You are a premature crowd - for as long as the mass media doesn't uphold the next Level of maturity ... I mean, its easy to get on a wrong track or trip; And so - do you trust me? You'll notice that this trust in me is never really an issue because the trust you got in your own ability to judge things has brought you here in some greater expectation of, well ... you would know!
So - yay! Anyway. Thanks to a YouTube Channel that goes by the name of 'Cracked' I've - well - come to see a few things I find concerning. And so - the most concerning bit is 'bashing'. So, not getting any further into how I might agree with their standpoints; I got to take a step away from them and yet just ... keyword: Evolution.

And no - I don't mean to bash against folks that think Science is equal to disprooving religion. But - I mean to write about oppinion now. The possibly unvoluntary main actor at this point would be Jerry Seinfeld. He says that there some "creepy P.C. thing" (P.C.: Politically Correct) going on - and before things are about to get loud; This is more of an inside topic. However - also: I want to say that yea, perhaps I am getting too old or am somewhat out of touch with reality myself - ... but so, what is racist? What is sexist? To me it often seems like these words are arbitrarily thrown around like folks got no clue what they're talking about. Well - my first contact with racism of some sorts was the following: I built a Lego Gundam once; One of the less pathetic do-it-yourself action figures basically inspired by Power Rangers; And I decorated it with the colors of the german flag (Black, Red, Yellow); And friend who once visited us saw it and asked me if I'm a Nazi. And it didn't make any sense. I didn't even know what a Nazi is!

I can agree with the idea that times have changed; That since we're living in a more open world now that people who grow up in it have a slightly different perception and thus referring to different things than I do/did when speaking of racism and sexism. Racism for instance to me includes hatred; Strong feelings, ignorance - yet always something politically motivated - or, and thats where the weight has gone to these days it seems, otherwise insulting. So, Street Fighter being full of 'racist' stereotypes would make it racist; But since I don't see the insult I'd say that this is a kind of racism we shouldn't mix up with the other kind. Otherwise - I'm sure its a bit sarcastic - I can call myself being extremely sexist just for being a guy!
And how is this going to lead back into the topic? Well - Evolution!

As - there are many things spinning around my mind - and as I was previously writing about engagements into discussions, talking about movies is one of those things; Then celebrities, Video Games ... and somehow I start feeling like wanting to erase Movies and Gaming from my C.V. hobbies. I don't wanna call myself a gamer anymore. Its a culture I've grown somewhat stranger to - and mostly because of all that talking and that mostly because of all this "side knowledge" that comes into play; It to me is some form of internet illness. Now we could argue about who's out of touch with things - but so let me tell you: Acknowledging the Facts of Social Evolution binds us to recognition that we're 'never' 'there', at the end of the road. So, the "Universe" (all reality) exists between the Eternal and the Finite. Because existence is definite - there is that which is absolute; Like a rock, like that a rock is hard. We can establish that. But eternity - or to more appropriately put it: Immensity - means that you can never pile up enough of them to reach its limit or deplete its wealth. So is throwing around with facts and figures like throwing around with stones, or, piling them up to be less violent.
These days are "new" to us - as civilization - because of the Tech, but to some degree that tech ... well we weren't prepared for it. Ancient Philosophy still has its values and as we depend on the mighty of our civilization to take care of our intellectual legacy we need them to be 'capable' - as in: "Intellectually profficient" - to do that. But are they? They don't believe in Qi - simply put they possibly never seriously tried to practice and learn Tai Chi for instance; Probably taking Yoga as the go to alternative despite it being entirely different and well, good because we won't talk about Qi at all!
It is the problem with atheism that it perpetuates the ill situation of our world. Its true and real that the man or woman or whatever who lacks a center in life other than the own self tends to put itself into the center of things; Well granted, usually with a proper amount of respect to fit into society; But thats how we get to that so called 'self entitlement'. You might not sound different than me once you do - but thats just because we're all using words to elaborate our perspective. But if you realize how my writing usually always yields from and to Eternity you can figure out that I have a center in my life that isn't me; And once I put myself into the focus its still not different.
But so - me and how I do things isn't ultimately the focal point. Yet all of you, thats those that aren't Unified with God, are, compared to me, like a large frigate compared to a speedboad when it comes to ... something rather important - where speed and agility are what matters. The reason would however justify for another comparison. You're like folks that went to some Dojo to learn Martial Arts compared to me who went to Muten Roshis island to do so. Kindof. Or, Kami, or King Kai. But we might also say that we're from two totally different Universes; Where - if I were to keep me in the Dragonball Universe, you'd be ... well ... in Newtons Universe. So, because my concern is ultimately wider than yours I suppose; Well - OK, just how much? Lets take a simple thing: Wrongs! How capable are you at fixing your shit, or, dealing with people that fix theirs? Or, we might for simplicity yet just have to settle with concepts of fixing. You so exist in a world - that I exist in as well. So, we have a common thing there. Now - God is real; And that has introduced concepts into my life that I didn't know of before that. I don't mean theological concepts you can learn in school. I specifically tried to avoid that side of religion. It are for the most part not even religious concepts!
So - on a general note: As God has kept silent for the most part you should be able to agree that a more intimate relationship with God - a mutual one - should introduce concepts into ones life that you don't really know of. Maybe you know some of them, but you don't know which ones. Therefore its a complete Mystery we can say.
Regarding Ancient Philosophy, to move that plot forward, our world today is definitely too fast paced - too much effectively 'forcing' each individual as intellectual concurrence into society so that the broad average of society exists between just dumb and just smartasses.
I don't mean to generalize too much though. We might agree on the point that this world doesn't know what to offer - and that mostly because what we so would refer to as "the world" or "the system" is composed of people that again are victim to their own society; And so yea - YouTubers that so "hate against" "the System" are in some effect yet still a part of it! Whether what they say is smart or not. Bottom Line: Jesus vs. Simon the Sorcerer. Simon the Sorcerer is actually a Biblical figure (Acts 8:9++) - and well, I guess I suffer a little bit of the Mandela effect myself since I haven't read that much scripture for a while. So - I thought it was somewhere in the Gospels. I guess I get simon mixed up with some other stuff; Essentially that word of Christ against 'people like Simon' - or as it actually goes: Jesus about people that were wrongfully preaching in his name; Saying that He'll tell them that He never heard of them (so, to piss off!). The point is: I rather grasp the higher concept that is expressed on multiple ends. And the thing with these higher concepts is that they can appear as totally different ones depending on what context they emerge in. Thats how I remember and make sense of it. (By the way: I here mean by 'Mandela Effect' a falsified memory; Just generally. Which is extremely annoying within ongoing conversations that fade into backtracking what has been said to figure out who is actually right.)
So the thing with what someone "teaches" - the teacher will lead its pupils always there where he himself came/comes from. And therein also lies my problem with creative work - in regards to which I actually have to thank God that He effectively made me miss any chance I might have at getting into that business! Its though mostly a matter of authority. Each authority automatically inherits the position of a teacher; As a producer is at some point just as stupid of a critic as the rest of the world! But so most people wouldn't understand that - or so - people that share their oppinion don't mean to lead anyone anywhere - and ... I guess more of this takes us too far off topic.

Anyhow - back on track. The Mystery. First of all - learning from God is not like school where you get lessons on a tight schedule. And thats said to inch forward to the concept of Universality. It doesn't make sense to "teach" you about the things you cannot learn from me - so I would prefer you to see me as a pupil or student who refers you to 'the One Teacher' - rather than being teacher myself.
But effectively it is yet given into 'our' hands to give you a roadmap - and that roadmap also can be seen as a test; Yet its less of a test like succeed or fail; Its simply ... like a test-flight. Though we know that airplanes can fly; The only way to make sure that the plane does fly is to fly it once - at least - and to possibly fix some last issues of the design.
God on the other hand is like the air. To do a test-flight you don't check whether air still is a thing or not - the air will do its thing as you do the things that require it to do what it does.

The concept of Universality as I call it now has lots to do with the simplicities of complexity. So, once 100s of people each with their own YouTube channel speak of their own world view we get to a fragmented whole. Defragmenting that chaos will be complicated - though in essence, in theory, its totally simple. This simplicity is however broken through individual/independent priorities - and these are possibly in danger of enthropically polarizing each other leading to a more sever fragmentation and correspondingly a greater chaos of the world. The classic way to however consolidate peace would be to sit them around a table and to have them find a consensus - the Universalistic approach, well, would try to get them in touch with God so that God would change them from inside and the fragmentation would individually shrink as the Universal concepts independently grow within each individual.

So, lets pick ... secureteam10. I've seen a few of his videos and to the most part I consider his channel as good because it/he does what it is supposed to do. If I want to know where we're at today regarding "the deep space mystery" and Alien stuff, I believe his is a very objective channel. But then he's also an atheist thats shocked by scientists in space talking about God - so, which is the polar opposite to flat earth believers being somewhat totally religious all accross. In the Universal perspective both groups have their very own problems to fix. Objective people will have more objective problems - Subjective people will have more subjective problems. Obviously those that believe in science have a more intelligent oppinion objectively, while folks that believe in God have a more intelligent oppinion spiritually.
What seems as though it cannot be united - is however united in the common truth already!
So the point! Or: The more that people grow in an understanding of the truth, the wider the common foundation will become! And thats a real life example of one of those "the truth is out there" statements.

'Deceivers' follow a similar concept. They firstly impose themselves - passively or actively - however working towards a social recognition that they can build on by expressing the personal significane - like Trump claiming that he's the only one who can solve Americas problems. Thats the word given that is then ultimately present in society; While the whole process can be pictured in Fantasy CG stuff where the "goons" now have to 'feed' that foundation as to give people a common foundation to stand together on. I try to not do that - but there are certain 'truths' that cannot be changed. And because it works I sometimes find an opportunity to put some stuff out there for the same reasons.

What is otherwise known as the 'Omnipotence Paradoxon' is like any other Paradoxon just a glitch in our Logic; And well - that eventually because this Universe has been created as Paradox. It makes sense! If I am to believe science that 'time' has 'become' X splits of a second 'after' the Big Bang - well - thats true to the core; And finally makes it so that if we are to trust reason we are to trust that this world is Bullshit - or at least that its not as trustworthy as God is.
So - to our mind a Paradoxon is simply a conflict. Two truths can however not be conflicting - which is the paradoxon of truth, or the paradoxons of truth, once two truths yet stand in conflict. What God can do, and we can do it too, is to purposefully create two legal truths standing in conflict. The Omnipotence Paradoxon however can be solved because reality is finite and absolute. That does take us to principles. The idea of principles as introduced here is for once that they are absolute - and that two principles cannot contradict each other. So, while we might encounter thought and will to be two totally different things that cannot be united - the contradiction is artificially created since their conflict is resolved through life. Yea - I just said that they contradict and thus established an artificial contradiction.
As Rama Khandra (Matrix Revolutions, that Hindu program guy) puts it: What matters is what the Word implies!
There is a specific meaning to Life, Thought and Wanting in which they resonate to each other yielding the 3 (base) principles of reality. If you then go and adjust the meaning of even just one of those terms to violate that harmony, well, it makes no fucking sense anymore!

So - how I learned it, I suppose, (I try to get an educated understanding of it - though the way I learned it was effectively more vigilante) is to not try to understand those terms on base of philosophy, but on base of reality. You have to so establish the demand that the definition of those three words has to make sense in establishing what we know and see about reality; And on a smaller scale in our minds. That might appear like cheating - but thats like twisting good racism into bad racism and calling it evil!
So - I sortof challenged you to find what you might yet add to either the 3 Principles or the 4 Lights - but on other terms you might also try to expand those terms so you don't have to add anything. For case and point of Eternity: Life is Eternal as is Thought and Wanting - at which point we're however referring to God!
Starting with a more thorough interpretation of reality on that basis we however delve into the topic of the 12 Aeons.

For simplicity however we can make out the presence of Thought almost everywhere. Or yea - quite everywhere. Physics - or 'physical Laws' so to the point. We realize for instance, so in terms of Light, that Light itself isn't really 'mass' or substance, but a mathematical formula tied to a more or less defined point in space. Will on the other hand is more apparent to us when we're dealing with feelings; Pain for instance. Or finally all motion in the Universe. Regarding Existence/Life we don't really have to argue!

What this says is though that Existence 'has' Thought and Wanting inherantly, thus effectively making Existence Life! We can also further explore this doing Tai Chi or Yoga or Dancing. Or just an air-punch; So, to see how its also true to say that Wanting has Thought and that Thought has Wanting - so that we rather don't speak of them 'having' the other thing, but more of them 'equally being' the other stuff; Or generally emphasizing their inseparable unity.



Regarding social evolution this is something that should keep you thinking; And you'd realize that no matter how much you keep thinking about it, trying to understand the 'grandness' of God, you won't get any 'further' - "percentually" - in actually realizing what you intend to. I would say thatt his is a normal reaction for once, meeting the general problem of infinity - as our inherant inability to 'grasp' Eternity.

This problem is similar to the problem of Evolution described earlier. As you may wonder: If we're never 'there' - what can we make of our 'now'? And "enthropists" might take it like bait to go and cause further social enthropy - Carpe Diem and Yolo (how disrespectful is that? I take offense in that expression (YOLO(L)) - though actually there is truth to them) - though the solution is way easier than fucking yourself and everything else up and making a huge effort of ignoring anything real in reality! But yea, "better heed the Bible", as it says that we should build our stuffs on the Mighty Rock! One stone after another. If you can find consolidation in life through just being stupid, what makes you think that you can't if you make a little effort of being less stupid? Or to be less insulting - try to let go of absolutisms that aren't established on the absolute!
Which also means that 'logic reasoning' - which is vastly thought to be the key thing to going beyond the basics - shouldn't be overrated all that much! I mean - if you get a vibe of smartness from me which seems to be built on logic reasoning - thats an inaccurate impression! The way it effectively works is way more logical than that! It starts with the idea - and as you expand the idea you eventually arrive at points that intersect with the absolute - and those are individual elements you can so 'rank up'. What I try to say is that an idea usually is composed of more than just one element, as dependent on multiple issues. What you have to learn is to see what your ideas depend on - and because that can grow way too complicated way too quick; You're well advised in taking the simplicity of God first!

Ideas finally also have something like an inherant shape - which can be iterated into principles. So, if you want to think of an idea as of a sphere that has dependencies growing into each direction; You'll eventually arrive at dependencies you can't right away solve. So, the matter itself grows into complexities you at some point have to take a step back from. 'Faith' is an underlying principle or concept that basically is simply put 'trust' - and one problem is that 'trust in God' is technically not the same as 'trust in physics'. When we speak of physics we speak of absolute issues; So, if we buy a car we expect it to work and usually they do so because the physics that make them work usually don't fail. Regarding God we however speak of an Entity with free will, hence there is some uncertainty to it; Which is why 'Faith' essentially is a matter of God supporting the trust you put in Him. But I don't mean to say that you should jump from a skyscraper trusting that God will catch you! He might, but eventually the pavement does the trick already!
So should Faith also be considering that physics are as much Gods work as whatever we would call a Miracle. And thats God for me! You can trust that He does what He does - and you sortof have to adapt; Yet this world shows us that we have a lot of space, actually, to develop our selves! We so can do whatever we want! Even jumping from skyscrapers!
Classical struggles between believers and atheists .../ Lets settle this another way. We can see each idea for a sphere - but what now composes that 3 Dimensional space is entirely subjective at first. So people can start to think and look for dependencies that aren't resolved, asking questions, demanding the person with the idea to explain. Because God has given me a creative talent I know how this works in fantasy! I'll just make something up! Regarding 'Zion' however - for instance; Its not as easy as just making stuff up! The inherant concept I im-/pro-posed, that the flaw of Utopia is a fixed/solid concept, is partially a matter of idea. A more pragmatic example would however be programs/apps that get updated and loose functionality in progress; Which is usually a result of starting from scratch and that because a 'newer' perspective also somehow inherantly moves away from the old one. If we want to trust a solid concept, we have to trust the people that crafted it - and the idea behind Zion is that God is its Architect and if a human being were to now take this position 'claiming' to speak for God or to be somehow enlightened by Him is just shady! I mean, if that would yield a solid concept we'd so have to swallow. So the 'real' solid concept, since we arguably need one at any rate, is that of making the consensus happen. That of course not as a matter of enforcing a law for instance, ... but - by means of supporting the Universalistic solution.

That then is one other point where we need 'the One'. I'll put it like that - so in the sense of, well, being myself someone who really believes in that - like - its a Universal concept; Like, we might rephrase that so that 'the One' isn't someone particular, but 'the One' who ends up having the largest influence on things. Well - of course its a concept born in hindsight, effectively. Or otherwise its a problem or challenge to formulate the nature or existence or expectations of/on 'the One'; Which is also I guess where the opposition stands - but ultimately the matter is an issue between truth-seekers and deceivers.
What the one finally or ultimately does is that he/she does/will lay out a foundation of sorts. So, there are elements that are more or less obligatory, to say, they are principles of the matter. Like, some office in charge of infrastructure; Or more generally, some system of control/organization.
So - it is to my concept an inherant principle that not all dependencies are ultimately resolved - which means that it is extremely tricky to defend it aginst that particularly ask for that. But so it isn't really a project, like a package, that someone is saying of: "Here it is, now follow along!", but more something of an idea in shape of a hope or (pro)vision whereto the Universalistic solution necessarily is a matter of Faith.

What I so mean is that the idea is here not practically a sphere in that all dependencies can be harmonically attached to a definite thing, but more like a tube, like a cannon, that roots in something fundamental and basically "shoots off" into space following a principal vector - that is ... Faith. So - in the end we can call it a tree that yet has to grow tall.
Faith means that we don't have to constantly check whether or not the principles of Growth are still in tact - where for the sake of seeing it as a sphere we simply say that everything comes from and yields to Eternity.
The most absolute thing you have in your life is yourself - and in the Eternity-Finity duality Life extends between yourself and God - hence - the logic is simply that you gain the greatest sophistication through yielding things to yourself in reference to that duality.




3. THE 12 AEONS



That the 12 Aeons are a thing is a "mystery" as is math. And because of that it is important that the 3 Principles and the 4 Lights are understood correctly; Just like '1' is '1' and not '1.2'. Well, first of all, you'll have to agree that 3 multiplied by 4 equals 12. If you're still struggling at understanding the 4 Lights, you'll see it a bit better in terms of the 12 Aeons. For simplicity we can however stick to the ... Mercy-Perception duality. So, the 3 Principles and 4 Lights are two isolated/independent "transfigurations" of reality - where to keep it as simple as possible we only wanna stick to Mercy because Mercy is the most obvious thing in reality; And that by the way because its inherantly a matter of perception. (Yea, what a Pun!)

So, is this substance that we see now Life, Thought or Wanting? The answer: Its wanting!

The Logic of the 12 Aeons is achieved by "Multiplying" the Principles with the Lights. Taking only one Light we only get 3 Aeons. One Aeon is thereby - as I made sense of it personally - a Layer or Phase of reality; But when talking this way one should not forget the inherant Unity to Everything. So, if we multiply Mercy by the 3 Principles we get to the 3 Aeons of Mercy; Which are: Mercy, Truth and Form. The term Mercy inherantly refers to the visible - thus the visible Aeon is also just called Mercy. And as what you can see is inherantly tied to Motion and Physical Laws - yes - we see that we essentially can't separate one from the other. Technically Physicists are working on it, and maybe also achieved the one or the other thing there, but ... physics doesn't exist on the basis of the Real Mechanics of Reality. We can see that within our imagination. If you picture something, anything, the visible thing is thought and wanting.
As the Aeon Mercy (I'll from now on try to write the Lights in all caps to destinguish from the Aeons) is an Aeon of Wanting, Truth is the corresponding Aeon of Life. Here Truth is the less sophisticated kind of Truth, as simply put: Everything that does exist is Truth. So, Lies are Truth too in that they do exist. If you imagine a sphere - there is further also 'Form', an Aeon of Thought, which we might say gets constituted by truth in order to become Visible Mercy. We might want to draw it anatomically, like taking a cherry and saying that its skin is the Form, its meat is Mercy and its seed is the Truth - but thats ambigous since we can't actually extract one from the other. Neither can we separate PERCEPTION from Mercy, as once we imagine something its there - or if we want to PERCEIVE something its also there. Which is ultimately something of the Aeon called Perfection, but we get to that later.

PERCEPTION holds the Aeons: Insight, Perception and Memory. Memory is what we might effectively call the foundation of reality. Its an Aeon of Thought; And it describes the otherwise inexplicable fact of definition - ... - or ... well, I at least imagine Memory like a Grid, like in Sci Fi flicks or as generally used to "draw" spacetime, or just space for that matter. We might also say that its the RAM (Random Access Memory) of Reality. So - the relationship between Mercy and Insights can make us suggest some inherant familiarity between the Aeons of a Principle - so, at least this gives us a foundation to formulate Memory as: Any Form that exists does ultimately exist in Memory. What Perception "does" is finally obvious! Its our perception of Truth - though when we so 'think' 'House' - we can't ultimately get an 'Insight' of it - because the 'Insight' is Mercy and the 'Memory' is Form.
But its there.

LEVEL-HEADEDNESS holds the Aeons: Understanding, Love and Image. Here things get a little bit more abstract. There isn't really a lot that I can say if I'm honest to how I've learned it other than that the things explain themselves when thinking about it. Understanding is an Aeon of Wanting, so its closely related to Mercy and Insight. Because its Wanting - I simply refer to it as our ability to control the images we produce; So, the muscles of Mercy. Love - well - doing the Math is the same just in terms of Truth, so, adding to our ability to 'Understand (the Aeon -> 'Active arrangement of Forms/Memory//Insight/Mercy)' the ability to sotosay 'deepen' a thought - while Image is that same "Magical Power" on Level of Form. So - LEVEL-HEADEDNESS "combines" all these into our ability to ... 'do stuff'. Image obviously could be called the main reason why we can think, though, I suggest 'Symmetry' to be one of the better examples to point a finger on something. We might also refer to it as 'the Logic'. Easy!

UNDERSTANDING is now not this active Understanding, obviously, which holds the three Aeons: Perfection, Peace and Wisdom.
Perfection to me is best recognized in Intention - so, being 'Perfection' to the point that its what actually or ultimately allows us to do stuff. Wisdom on the other hand isn't to be mixed up with Understanding, Love or Image - but of course Wisdom is a part of them that allows them to truely "function". Its our ability to conclude what we get when adding 1 to 2. Or to reason out what the result of combining a house with a shoe might be.
Peace is really that thing that boggled my mind the most, back in the days, though nowadays - where I have a much more developped "Zen" - I can more easily accept that it is just that one final mystery of Existence, or, primarily the "Spiritual Nature" of reality. We might say its the assymetry to the symmetry - or the factor that so abstracts the mechanical elements of the Spirit through intuition, though intuition is more of a Love thing.



I wouldn't call 'enthropists' as downright evil. I would even claim that enthropists are essential to us - they actually are what Evil sortof claims it is good for. I get it through the Co-Optional Podcast, where I would say Jesse Cox is the one who by being "Enthropic" to some eventual bias their party evolves cause some form of higher stability that however also shatters the 'finalizing harmony' that bias so tends to consolidate - which is however not always good as we see in how genes work for instance (keyword: Incest). And it is thanks to those people that we don't have to worry about growing too ignorant - for as long as we have an open ear for them. That however is also, well, obviously, where we have some legitimate reasons to grow paranoid. But - I have learned that preferring not to be paranoid is the better way to Go(d) - because Paranoia essentially has no legitimate space in Heaven. So, we're inherantly supposed to 'diminish' our Paranoia thus in progress demanding God to take actions that make Evil basically defeat itself. I've been there a few times. Maybe countless times. The Matrix stuff is essentially the ultimate expression thereof; Right now at least.

So, anyhow - I had to learn dealing with the enthropy; Which is, well - the first time I wrote "this" - so, some writing purposefully aimed at introducing the reader to the concepts behind the 12 Aeons, I started with Wisdom; Basically leaning towards the complexity of the Universe as established through interactions. Once one thing meets the other, stuff happens and we get a result. Thats basic "mind math". Since then I sortof ignored that line of work I did - while basically realizing it as done and hence I might do it again once the time had come. That was something I barely even had control on - though I didn't even really try because of how my decision making had evolved. What I so do, essentially, is that I'm "throwing" my 'Perfection' "into a Direction" and see if I perceive a "positive ending". The eventually things get arranged in my Memory - and I only have to follow it up with ... my "Pistis Sophia" (LEVEL-HEADED UNDERSTANDING) - or simpler: Understanding. Thats where these larger structures that you see in my writings come from.
This means: I don't want to take any credits for that! I can't! Some might deflect from this that I'm heretic/blasphemic as they impose that what I'm writing is trash bullshit testifying of a deeply rooted psychosis that is established through a series of dilemmata constituting into a cycle of doom perpetuating an inherant paradoxon that'll ultimately crush me as inevitably fuelled by each word my mind produces. The only way - and that sentence would confirm it - I could redeem myself from it would be to bow to the Antichristian Kingdom, but the confirmation is that I refer to it as Antichristian and thus I'm ultimately shutting myself out of my Salvation. The whole point of this kind of argumentation though is that I'm referring to the wrong people as the right people; Or worse; That I'm referring to myself as the right guy! Ultimately that requires you to see this through their eyes - while ultimately biasing yourself to confirm their argumentation thus essentially propelling yourself into a cycle of doom perpetuated through the blindness of that bias.
Their entire argument that is to ultimately confirm their claims there requires you to stay the fuck away from me which will ultimately keep me in this lock forever and thus actually creating the fact that my labour yielded no fruits. Because the fruits I claim are important are consolidated within my words that you so however then chose to subject to your bias they obviously come accross as flawed, or in biblical terms: Spoiled.
Yea - I admit, my writing can at times be a bit crooked, but I would say that a part of that is the result of my writing speed. Insights sometimes keep on coming quicker than I can type them out, and my typing skill is at around 390 hits per minute. I do only occasionally have to stop for a moment, or rather ever 'now' and again to somehow refocus since its essentially still my own work.
Magical segways included.

Whether it is now fear or just healthy objectivity that keeps you stunlocked from trusting this, as matter of 'waiting out' for a legitimate opposition to show up or a legitimate discussion to somehow begin to begin with, well - is also bypassing one of the inherant statements; The well meant advise to check out God before doing anything else. Sometimes a really short burst is enough, you more often than not can even totally skip the detail and be done with it. Verbally communicating with God has a greater influence on yourself than it is important to properly communicate with the Father, or the Lord!
These details - the 'authentic theology' - thats something that is being, I'd say, valued too high and that because the 'mortal theology' is dependent on extending the logical understanding to its fullest inherant potential; While in reality, to our relationship with God, knowing about Jesus is as easy as it gets and why would He demand anything further? Yea - science - but not everyone is a scientist!
What ultimately stands as the more important figure in regards to science here is that the science has to be relatable to those that aren't - and that not just by blind acceptance of convulated figures! But so - that is ultimately only really a legitimate thing once the individual does have a reasonable Understanding of God - which in all simplicity does come along with Unification - its sotospeak a part of the package; Or effectively its intended purpose so as practical iteration on Baptism.
Yet - though the 'final parts' are delivered through Unification - the way there is still one that is to incorporate God; So to 'let the truth guide you there'. It is so extremely important from my standpoint that you do it so - because, well, you may read how Peter and John reacted to Simons request.
My belief is that the time of Miracles have gone since the time of the Antichrist has started. Since that to me means that some key element ... unintended pun, but still relating to Matthew 16, somehow ended up in the wrong hands; And the sentence, I don't know where to find it, that if "the days won't be shortened there would be no hope for us" refers to that same issue; Which ultimately means that God will have to break a promise, I believe, which also means that God doesn't think that this "person" we would consider being the Antichrist. A strong reference to that can be found in 2 Thess 2, where the general key verse is 4, but the one I have to refer to here is 7.

I mean - this topic can be subject to a whole lot of fearmongering. I have been victim to that too. All it took for me to get utterly desturbed was some guy showing me a tree with hairs; Which spawned, or attracted, all those theories of what the Antichrist believes/belived he can do - I guess a desturbing average transfiguration of these things would be an Aquarium in the Vatican wherein Jesus/God is held prisoner.
The Principles/Lights/Aeons thing is also a useful tool to increase the fear factor, which however requires us to either see it as incomplete - to somehow separate 'a soul' from the whole or to just 'overthink' the way things work; To so move away from the 'inherant one-ness of everything' and get into a view of relationships between components thus emphasizing the hypothesis of a more technical duality which then allowed us to suggest some 'removal of identity' from something like a 'divine power' - in a sense that 'the Spirit' is in deed Spirit, but not at all an inteligent being. That basically issues the theory that Jesus is like us - that we are all Eternal entities but that Jesus was the one who woke up first and thus bonded with it becoming God. Then the story goes on into ambiguity revolving around that Chapter 16 of the Matthew Gospel (Verse 19) - where I believe that it is a paranoid thing to think about Peter having guessed it so and believed he could fake Jesus into trusting him to then turn his back on him. I believe it to be more accurate that the then emperor of Rome was interested in this Christian movement inviting Peter to Rome; And Peter essentially plaing Dumb allowing the Emperor to trick him into giving him that key. From there on I suppose things moved on - and that whole 'Providence' bullshit that Hitler was talking about is essentially reflecting the "psychosis" that the Antichrist developed around himself in regards to the powers he then posessed. Thus Antichristians are to accept him as their God because the Universe somehow chose him as the more worthy God. This ill progress (self delusion) did continue; Though God had tricked J.Lo into believing that she's the chosen one - for me - to get this whole thing started - but she ultimately fell and some followed and thus some "new juice" was introduced to the Antichristian compound, what we might effectively refer to as "them larning how to be cool". Which as we might see right now has entered yet another phase of stagnation.

What you might easily perceive as conflict has to be resolved by them as much - which leads us to the 'cloud' theory, or the 'lifeboat' theory; Like Jesus having uploaded a part of his consciousness into what Chapter 16 refers to as Heaven; Behind some firewalls - which might be since when that Aquarium thing is a thing. I also believe that the Antichrists powers are still limitted since Peter was advised to create some "just in case" safety measures.

I further believe - now - that they refer to us as slackers, or what germans call "Gutmensch" (Goot-Mensh) - (Good Human) - which is a word that "Haters" use to hate against people with a positive attitude; So yea, the opposite of Hitler.
What exactly they can do is however something I don't know. I do however hold a few memories which however are a bit confusing - since I'm not entirely sure what the premises to those situations have been. Yet, Teleportation, Telepathy and Metamorphosis are three things - next to granting Eternal Life - that I have to heavily understand are part of their reportoire. But I don't believe they can actually mimic other real life people; Which is where I guess they have to acknowledge that despite us being slackers and gutmenschen we're still good at something; I guess though, to their experience, we're douchebags or assholes in that we're sortof intellectually pedantic and respectively skillful in what may be considered some form of Information Technology. So - the safeguard there probably follows a definition along the lines of disallowing 'mimicing real life people' specifically - so that any kind of workaround is already inherantly denied.
One thing I don't quite know of but still do believe is the ability to seed the own mind accross multiple bodies; While I also suggest that the 'Eternal Life granting' is less of an eternal youth thing but more something like rebirth control. So in some sense the Antichrist to me is the Agent Smith of our world.
On another note: The Book of Mormon mentions another guy who received the same thing; Which is I guess the top Level thing of the whole real world James Bond Action. Effectively we might broadly come to the same conclusion that the Antichrist is furthermore more of a Businessman type of Guy than an intellectual; Though; They'd be extremely left behind if they wouldn't have organized a potent think tank structure.
And that takes me to Destiny. I couldn't have gotten to that game regarding these issues any other way; And that vastly due to the fact that its a magnificent piece of art! I belive its a mix of espionage, keeping normal people in the mix and and high ambitions. As a matter of returning the douchebag/asshole favours I'd say that they are deviously bright in certain regards - as for instance turning their weaknesses into strengths; So, learning, level headed planning; And respectively level-headed artwork.

So - the story about Teleportation and Metamorphosis is something that leaves me to include some form of tinkering with our minds; Though that more on behalf of certain exploits/hacks to say they would so much Love to be capable of more! There is some degree of making us forget things - though the memory can't be shut off forever. They might though be capable of fucking someones mind up quite severly. I further believe that 'hype' is the most recognizable of their "powers"; Or has been, they might want to lay low at some point; Although its eventually their best bet at winning; But I don't believe that its only them that add up to it. They just have something like an advantage - and their basic strategy I guess revolves around getting people onto their hype train; Just like, well, Hitler back in the days in germany. That isn't only present in art, but also racism, hatemongering, fearmongering; That kind of stuff.

You might soon or maybe already have realized how this issue ties into concerns around Mormonism and what I'm trying to tell you; And because of the background facts they have some easy to twist background they can apply onto everything - like claiming that the Testimony is part of the Antichrists powers - while they might go as far as to keep the amount of powers withheld from "me" to a minimum to make me appear as intimidating as possible thus effectively 'encouraging' a sense of cooperation thats tightly linked to those few sources of "divine influence". By the way: that people nowadays so freely twist 'racial recognition' into downright 'evil racism' is ultimately part of the plan it seems, more obvious than not, since it basically "harmonizes" well with the fearmongering as simply increasing the divide between two parties that might eventually be kept as something like a backup plan; Or simply darkening our times for the cause of tieing normal people deeper into dependency to them.

The '"funny thing"' is that they kindof cannot believe what I believe because they have to believe what they believe is the truth of the things that I believe in. Ultimately we now however have the Architect talking to the Antichrist - and those that ultimately believe in the 'the Illuminati created it' story might just be themselves; Except some tracks are explicitly theirs! Then there is the cloud/safeboat theory - leaving some riddles; Like how in the ...; Which are things I for myself can't/dontwanna think about because it hurts my brain.
Well - regarding more of their Character - there is some weird conflict going on I believe. For once our times today demand them to have a good face - while there are still these "You don't know whom you're talking to" kindof ... well ... it might be "eruptions" ... by which I essentially just mean to say that I think one the Antichrist traits is 'being Cock-Sure' - who has a really tough "shield" of some regards that allows him to appear like one of the better guys on the planet though once getting at him from a "wrong angle" that shield is extremely thin - or - his attitude mixing with exposure usually leads to some inherant patterns of behaviour that are more or less trademark items of that Hellclub.
Which leads me to 'world hacks part 2' - suggesting that they don't have one core weakness the rest of us have: Emotional "Flexibility" - so, they can't be unsure - so - even when exposed they essentially don't feel shame; For instance; Which means that they can never actually quite stop pretending that their world view is the right one. I mean, yea, of course - to some extent their world view is the one and only right one - thats because they're sitting on top of it - but that is naturally also just valid for a portion of what the world is, or it depends on what we define as the world. If we want to stick to biblical terms though the world is that which they control; Relative to which we'd have to use another word for the bigger thing; Like reality, existence, realm or Universe.
If you wanna bug them out, start correcting yourself once you accidentally say 'Pope' instead of something more complicated yet accurate like "The pontiff of the roman catholic church".
Uhm yea - this lack of flexibility is ultimately what gives them an edge in this hype thing - simply because they can sell the shittiest of all products for the best in the world; Effectively. The main reason why I have Destiny flagged as essentially one of their works is because of some, well, lets call them "excotic particles" or "mind waves" - its like, whenever I praise the game in some regard I can basically hear the Antichrist laughing. Eventually he figured that, I figure, since when he sortof tries to mislead me by pretending that he basically made everything, thus sustaining a view of our realm that is as dark as it can be. I have to however say that I am, according to my own judgement, the more open minded art critic - saying I take an artwork by its effective appeal - its like I can feel every aspect of a game before I even played it; And destiny isn't quite actually bad, its just, somewhat spoiled inside in a manner that is ... well ... lets just say: I don't have time to explain why I don't have time to explain.
But at some point the whole Oryx-Crota thing stinks of being a reference to Father and Jesus - various Characters show what I can relate to as Antichristian ... or "Neo Antichristian" ... thing ... stuffs - its extremely premature at some points while trying to be actually quite the opposite which leads to that "Antichristian Fold" (I mean, buttcrack) - which is effectively well condensed in that cliche badass stereotype; See: The Taken King trailers.
On another side has the game a quite ... well ... a very ... effectively even suspicially deep content - extremely versatile and well refined - while its obviously filled with hints at an extremely vast international "crowd source".

Without this context I find it further difficult to discuss other games that somewhat "smack me". Well, No mans sky is obviously some kind of a rip off; Conceptually - but certainly they wanna take care that I can't really complain. So - its also less the content that actually bothers me but some of these mind-waves. Another game on that List is Necropolis. But I'm far away from being outclassed and outsmarted - in my honest oppinion.

Effectively I'm outgrowing them and God is outsmarting them. I mean, He already outsmarted them before they even started!

And the possibly best, most rearding and redeeming thing about it is - while they put in a whole lot of effort into whatever they do, we can chill and let God do the heavy lifting! / Sunday, 24th of July, 2016 ad | 03:38 a.m.