What is real?

Main Audience: Alpha: Everyone. Beta: Fundamental Christians. Gamma: Philosophy Crooks



So, why Christians? Because to me, as "citizen" of the Western world (yea, actually - I'm a 'real' citizen ... but ...), having grown up as Seventh Day Adventist (which I would refer to as 'Fundamental Christian' (Not Christian Fundamentalist. There's an intended difference there)), I see FCs as ... well, as hollywood sees the Amish. I mean, I don't know 'who' that audience is that would be actually getting all the media specific things I tend to write without a proper introduction or explenations of some of the terms - but its certainly not them. I would guess that my main audience in general actually is a YouTube savvy Gamers audience - that, ... however is anyhow my persoanl environment - watching YouTube and playing Games.

But now so as a gamer ... the world I live in is still the world you live in. I have an address, I got a smart-phone, e-mail, internet, ... theoretically even a phone number (just no phone nor motivation to use it; Ringing, telephone or door-bells, are in a sense my Arch-Nemesis). (There are good ones though).


Thats the thing I want to focus on. I have - at the very least - my windows that give me a 'real' view of the world. Nothing I see in my head or hear from the void within it - or is however hallucinative, drug induced or divine, ... just as real as the look out of my window. If we turn on TV at the same time, that's applicable. Provided we turn on the same channel. Then we however have to differenciate: 'What' is it - that we see there? Saying that Reality Show 'is' that window into reality ... no! Nonono. Sorry I even went there. Clearly, we 'see' - most effectively - what given channel is broadcasting at that time.
So, the whole 'window into reality' term can be slandered with - as what for instance 'Propaganda' is known for. And no, I'm not talking about Christian propaganda - dear Christians. I'm talking about Nazi Propaganda with no intent to compare that to Christian propaganda. Thats a different thing. Its like ... at worse ... Abraham Lincoln Vampire Slayer. Maybe not substancial at first glance, but ... we can benefit from appreciating it.

The problem is more like the Mormon 'Golden Chain' problem. You compare News to being a window into the world - and you so "slander" (yea, we're all guilty of it I suppose) an untrue statement into common sense while "true enough" - which isn't 'bad' at all - ... but, so there is the maybe more appropriate term: 'Fake News'.


Or, there is now another term: 'Mainstream Media'.

So, as a gamer; ... Imagine me sitting in a boat. A small boat. No ... make it a Bathtub. So, with lots of foam - that being my life and the foam is a metaphor for games that obscure my vision and entertain me sitting in that tub - while playing with some plastic duck as metaphorical for me doing my silly things. Well, lets be cynical. So, every now and again I move some of that foam aside and watch some YouTube; And that is my 'main view'. In some sense. Lets compare it to a Box. In that Box there is this term 'Mainstream Media' - and here and there is Donald Trump saying 'Fake News' - and on some end a lot of talk about Progressive Politics, Liberals, Feminism ... - and clearly my perception of what 'Mainstream Media' is is influenced by that ... that way.

Christians would understand, though, their Box are a bunch of books written ages ago; And in case of SDAs, your occasional herald pointing out how shitty the world is we live in - how close it ties to whats written in the Bible - so, I doubt that we're going to wildly differ in oppinion here.

Though ... there is a "bug" in that assessment. Once you 'average Christian' were somehow dragged into becomming politically aware - how would you go about it? The thing is this: In my 'box' I do 'see' things ... which tell me that Mainstream Media is bad - and if you went there to get informed ... well, arguments could be had about who is right, ... lets cut to the chase!


I'll make a claim: If we are shown some Video showing something - the one who sees more of that footage is the one better informed. Its the 'context' problem. If some news Outlet puts Videos of Trump together where he contradicts to himself - I have a more informed oppinion about Donald Trump than you if you would only see one side of it. Matter of fact - a YouTuber by the name of 'Sargon of Akkad' has to be called out here. And that even in regards to another topic that can be seen as related. So, there is this YouTuber called PewDiePie thats kindof in the topics right now because the Wallstreet Journal called him a Nazi. Yea, sounds like Kindergarten. (Wallstreet fucking Journal ... seriously?). Going through it makes me wonder: Once you're accused that way, what can you do?
However. According to sargons narrative, PewDiePie is suffering the very same negative 'Fake News' backlash as Donald Trump. I was wondering ... but yea, there I have my case instance. The point is: There are Videos ... that make it very hard to take Donald Trump seriously - and here and there that badness seems to 'leak' out - like, how America reacted to Nancy DeVoss for Education. Thats when the real bad that there is actually bumps a wall.

For instance: From watching 'Secular Talk' I got infused with an idea of the world we live in that I'm willing to put on the desk as ... possibly wrong. I totally do not investigate what I'm told there - and effectively take it at face value. But there the narrative is that Donald Trumps choices for whom to put in charge of the various agencies are ... well, I'd say, from my impression, criminal. So, someone who is 'Anti Education' put in charge of Education. Taken that it might be wrong - then there's news of that having caught attention and led to a backlash. But I can't even verify if that piece of news is real!

I know however that I have investigated a guy named 'Alex Jones'. Someone whom Trump considers respectable and who put up some anti Clinton type stuff during the election which however showed to me what kind of a guy that is. He claims in one that Hillary scratching herself during the debate was a sign to the Moderator to ask a specific question that would allow her to trump down on Trump; But I watched the debate and all the trumps Clinton landed on Trump were basically given to her by Trump himself. No need for the moderator to ask any uncomfortable question!
Which is why you'll have a hard time endearing Trump to me!

Anyhow. Mainstream Media. So, more YouTube-Gamers-Media specific there is a woman that goes by the name of Anita Sarkeesian. She does that kind of stuff you would possibly deem - well - utterly useless. Pointless. Or, unimportant. The type of thing that if someone were to be upset about it - that wouldn't be taken too seriously. Even just describing to you whats going on around that name would make me look like a whiney bitch - just for having labelled myself, kindof, as a gamer. Well, except I give you her perspective. She's a feminist concerned of the depiction of women in Video Games. So, she points out whats Sexist in Video Games - and tries to ... advance gender equality in Video Games by doing so. On the other side there is the whole 'GamerGate' thing that I know little to nothing about; Yet however a lot of commentary against her; Which may be what she refers to as "online hate mob". Thats actually a thing she's been speaking to the UN (Yes, THE United Nations Organization thing) about - so, how hatred on the internet translates into real violence; So, including death threats and things like that. Now, the gamer in this picture is however the person who understands best what the fuck she's talking about. I mean - she's talking about Games - and gamers are known for playing them. Well ... I got to be a bit cynical here. Obviously. And the general consensus amongst gamers is that she's talking shit! So, this is an instance where some of the figures inside of my box draw bridges to things that are outside of that box. Because the things I watch rebuke Anita, and because the Mainstream Media endorses her, I see how this whatever it is that Anita sais manifests in Mainstream Media - and, whatever I had to tell you about it wouldn't matter if you totally don't care about what Anita has to say. This is not about that either.

But Anita has her Narrative - and her Narrative is ultimately drawing a picture that would pop up in some peoples windows. And the whole thing is a scam. I guess I would have fallen for it - would I know nothing about games. But what difference does that knowledge make? Well - she speaks all the things you'd wanna hear from a feminist with a positive agenda that you'd like to support - while yielding a lot of hate from the gaming community - which took her to the UN speaking against Cyber Bullying 'advocating' steps to be taken to take action against other peoples freedom of speech. That shit goes deep!

Almost too deep! I mean - can you take these accusations seriously? Do I have any evidence to back it up? Check out Thunderf00t. The thing is - there isn't just talks and claims. But what I see is that people have strong arguments against her - but aren't heard as much as they should be.

So, the whole 'Gamers vs. Feminists' thing isn't as much as a YouTube Cyber Mob against Anita Sarkeesian - but ultimately full of 'shared oppinion' that is a lot about freedom of speech and ... well. Saying that Feminists are getting there compared to Nazis isn't like with PewDiePie. No, its taking actual speech of what these Feminists advocate and stand behind - comparing it to our western standard. So, check out Undoomed. That is just to ... kindof put the things I want to write about here into context and relation. Well sure, a lot of homework - but at the end the idea matters. So, lets take Anita Sarkeesian as that super villain that schemes to undo our freedom of speech. Then Trump comes up - while Anita has already fueled some 'anti Liberal' fire by taking a Liberal position - and calls all the News he doesn't like 'Fake News'. Where is that going? Or - is it not even happening? What is real?



What cannot be faked ... these days?



If you met me - how would you know its not a clone? Or a doppelganger?



I understand that if there were something to be seen that I didn't see myself - and am told about it - I sometimes get a flawed idea. Or ... usually. What I mean is similar to that 'Hate Mob' thats harassing Anita. To you - if she so talks/talked about it - you possibly think of the YouTube icon, some angry silly comic face and some hateful comment next to it - with an impression of yelling that shouldn't be taken seriously. So, by Mainstream Media, that were your image of whoever is criticizing Anita if vaguely associated to YouTube or gaming. While the narrative of Anita appears plausible to you - all that must be unplausible; or at the very least you don't have an idea of what content that label covers up. Thats why people would make videos - to 'tell' you what is obvious, but not obvious to everyone; As some maybe just don't have the perspective. The people see it, hear it, a light bulb turns on; And so the message spread. And that would in part be responsible for that plan not to succeed. Except it was part of the plan ... so, Trump was happening. And as I kindof anticipated - some of those 'Anti Anita' people are now blindly pro-Trump (Sargon of Akkad). And yea - dear Christians: You're the silly folks that are out of the loop and therefore as gullable as necessary for them to have their way with you!


Well - however: Fake News isn't a conspiracy these days. Its ... a major crisis. Or as some say: We live in a new Dark Age.
Democracy functions based on our Oppinions; And dear Christians: It may not be the best thing we could have - but the only things better are ... in my oppinion most certainly not found on the regressive "back to Despotism" end. So, Democracy is a good thing; As far as our evolution as a species is concerned! But ... then we can go on and ask: Can we go and say anything even just a little bit hinting at something such as a 'legitimate oppinion'? What is freedom of speech?

I guess thats their line of strategy - I mean ... things passing by my window make sense for me that way: Because 'freedom of speech' is ultimately 'logically problematic' there are those that believe that it can actually be undone. "Or how would I go about it?".



There is a relation between these things. I mean ... Freedom of Speech and Understanding what is real go together. Because first of all, a rhetoric question: What is reality, but the accumulation of ideas we express and expressed?

Jesus is part of that. Jesus also just said things; And people were responsive to it (where I don't go by the Bible, but what I had to go by assuming that the Bible is true and Jesus the Word of God ... so assuming that a lot more has been said than is written - a lot more nuanced and relevant ... at that time). Matter of fact even so the written word, the idea, the symbolism - "tremendous". It there doesn't matter if Jesus was a real person - for the sake of argument. Jesus 'built' the western world that then gave birth to Democracy - as consequence of laying off the shackles of being oppressed by humans. Though instead of God they chose Freedom and Liberty as the guiding figures/Light ... but yea ... that way you don't have to deal with pseudo-experts on religion!

What is real? If I say something wrong - that is real. The talking, not the content. I mean ... anyhow. If someone points my wrongs out - that is real too. So - in a perfectly real world based on the realness of what we say, we actually don't have to worry our flaws. Once we ignore those things that we shouldn't - thats when it gets dangerous. But so, what is politics? I've heard some folks talking like that already - as being an issue between what we actually want or believe and the labels we slap on them. Maybe 'believe' is also ... kindof troublesome word in that context. Well, if we however learned to separate things we disagree on from things we agree on ... well ... we get to other problems. That of trolls - effectively.

Well, first of all - what I wanted to get to is the thing that nothing in reality actually even matters. Kindof. I mean - people getting hurt, on the other end, is then something that matters ... to me. Or at all. Its a part of this world that I would love to think about as a nice place ... and I'm in for that to the point that I'd want to bring violence to all those that stand against that. And by world I mean ... really ... not the Babylon thing that some Christians associate to the word 'world'.

So, thing being - the thing that our individual boxes make up our individual realities - and for the most time that works without us running into any problems with or without anyone of another political oppinion. Kindof because we're sharing equal values. So then politics isn't about that - but about ... politics. OK. So, the part where nation leaders do their things with weapons and ressources and people ... which is usually just real to a few compared to the whole unless we got a world war ... and then there is science. So, the thing that kindof practically emerges from our collective curiosity for how stuff in this world works and our communications about that.

Like ... I got one about Climate Change: Would you say, ... or ... lets wonder: If we wanted to destroy this planet without actually breaking it apart, just making it uninhabitable ... what could be done? "Voting Republican Ignorance" -LOL!

(And this 'in your face' look at thing kindof should help you understanding - what or how it sortof boils in me sometimes. At least if you so feel some kindof anger boiling up in yourself ... thinking about it, and about people that just don't wanna acknowledge ... that which has to be acknowledged!)

I'm sure you could also blame me for using electricity ... huff ... sigh ... whatever.



}...{



So ... anyway. As far as I'm concerned, Trump might be right and doing the right things! I mean - from some point of view its legit to go into the defense after having been too open. So, you get chaos spreading - and in order to get things sorted out you sometimes got to even the playing field. So, getting rid of ties - practically just going for as much of a reset as possible - but I'm cautious to bet on speculations like that because if that were 'my' goal for instance - I'd be letting people know of it. That because I'd be aware of the controversy and differing oppinions and would feel obligated to add my few cents to it, ... to ... help it that we can all be on the same page. Well - 'interpreting' motivations into peoples actions is a really really bad habit! And when I apparently do that - you got to take my word for it right now that its a bit more than that. At the very least do I not place any bets on those interpretations.

So, the big problem is misinformation - or a lack of the important pieces. So with Anita Sarkeesian - for simple. The information is there - just nobody would think that it is. Or, why else would she dare to step into the spotlight so boldly? (Do I hear anyone say: "Exactly! And that why ..." ??? - Yea, nice one!)
Its the oldest trick in the book, isn't it? The ... "would I play this game if I wouldn't win?" tactic. Of course its ... silly!



[sigh]:2017.02.27|11:58

There is no way to Union, other than by me

Instead of trying to solve this by giving it some 'final' "this is the way things [regarding these controversies] are" - I'm gonna get back to something I once wrote - being the general "political paradigm" I 'defend' - which is that for the most part "you" are 'in charge'. I mean, the idea that I alone can/will only do "so much" - not saying which parts are my obligation and which aren't. So, you are - by my "hopes and wishes" - encouraged not to only think and speak for yourself; But to also project the same onto others so we can all see and understand ourselves part of a greater whole. This is simple - lets call it a sphere - which we can break down into smaller and smaller clusters of issues - which is another representation of how I meant it. What I do were the sphere; And as things get broken down further and further, well, I cannot be arsed on the one side; While some of you would. And that on its own is however, once taken the wrong way, origin to chaos - or, a way back to the very same chaos we came from/are confined within.
So even that I myself become useless, as all these many minor individuals who can pop up would consume that space while - kindof sharing my perspective but sortof doing so ... I mean, if I were dead people would say: "I'd be spinning in my grave".

So, pedophilia being one of those topics. So, who is on which side? Is there a 'my side' to begin with? Is there a difference? Whats the difference? And in some sense - all of these are just words. OK. So, words add to reality - but they also have the ability to confuse it. The more we shift to settling things by/on the word - the further we abstract from reality and enter an intellectual space which in my oppinion has to at first be 'cleansed' - making space for the content rather than the personality.
Or where a personality - a destinct one - is "gate" for content - to make space for those personalities to be differenciated from the rest.

Like - I could go back and think about what Anita Sarkeesian speaks for and about and be like: "Yea, right!" - like, that females are generally portrayed in a sexualized way ... and - its hard for me to put it into words; But the way I get it there are like pools of fire of different "Light" - which people Unified with God can understand after a certain point of their development (a few years in; Comparable to 'dust settling' after an explosion). The thing is that certain perspectives link to individual pools - and one of those pools is like ... to be labelled as 'pseudo science' ... or ... science not leading us into the right direction. So, for instance the whole chain of influence. Like, I see arts where girls are sexualized and would from there on continue to do the same. Put that under the microscope as 'imposedly' the general consensus on a thing; And it'd contradict to an alternative way of going on where that'd be a fringe consideration. And a fringe consideration it is to me. Not that it is entirely nonsensical - just a 'bad focus' though - since it'd turn us into "henchmen" of an idea - being that we have to correct our arts to be responsible of our offspring; Which sounds 'responsible'; And the counter-argument of 'art is supposed to be free' wouldn't sound like being strong enough to hold against it; But so, the argument that art has to be free once taken as a central pillar of "the other pool" guarantees for a great controversy and bashing of heads. Saying, it seems weak on its own; But in the greater whole is a statement central to a wholistic understanding of life and the universe - where the undoing of it would equal to the undoing of Einsteins theory of relativity.

And I'm sure there are people who would make a huge effort of sticking to what I say; Just in a way thats totally despicable and would urge you to think I'm wrong! And my response to that would be similar to what Christ said about people using his name. Its written: "And many will come up to me saying: Have we not spread thy word? And I shall answer to them: Go away, I know ye not!".


Realize how I'm so far not really trying to destinctively advocate one specific 'pool' as the right one? I'm trying at least. And the reason is - that particular part of the equasion 'shouldn't' be solved by argument. Its pointless. Either you're on this or on that side - which is like: You're either on my side and then we can work together; Or you're not and you can get lost; For all I care!
This doesn't mean that you have to give up your free will as to be on my side - or the other, depending on which one has more ... "argument" for you - but if you're unwilling to be lectured by God - you're part of "that" wrong end of the story; And yea - the idea there is not one of obedience - but, just some 'basic' amount of respect for the creator. And if that statement drives you upset - well ... whatever.


If you're really interested in reality - so one of the 'main lines' of argument that are supported by this article - one of your main foci should be that of connecting to other individuals. What is nowadays here and there condemned (and here and there for the right reasons) as 'confirmation bias' is in a sense a derivative of our need to understand each other as living in the same reality. Clearly. You wouldn't wanna deal with me because I'm a believer for same reasons! That since to the atheistic mind I'd be talking "off world nonsense". You couldn't 'connect' to me. We'd be living in two separate realities though I claim we're factually, clearly, not!

The "forces of Evil" (or 'the Forces of Foolishness' to be more accurate) will succeed for as long as they are capable of keeping up the confusion, spreading wisdom that is pseudo-appropriate and in some regards inappropriate not due to the content but the context/side it/they support(s); And keeping me out of the loop will support that. And the value of it is ... yea ... after hours and hours of discussing rape still not getting what I tried to get accross. "Rape is Rape" - yea yea, fuck you!
Its a strategy. Negating the value of what has been said through ignorance!

So I wanna clean up this asumption that this whole 'intellectual' side of 'my side' is all about free speech. Free speech has no real place in science! Well - not if it means that my 'freedom to believe what I want to believe in' makes me ignore the things that shouldn't be ignored!

Equally there are problems surrounding me - like - "misunderstanding" the reality between taking me by my word and criticizing me. In the end everything I propagate is debatable - thats part of the nature of things. So clearly an "attacker" has plenty of space to do so; As mentioned previously in terms of the sphere and breaking it down. So be careful - as there is, as of yet, no official nor unofficial group that I do support. For all that I care: You, no matter how you group up in response to me, are on your own; When it comes to the true journey! And loosening some of your ties - at least where necessary to wak the way - is more a thing of the way than not!

If you feel like what you're socializing with is holding you back ... its possibly the best thing to sever ties!
Another thing I feel like I need to warn you about are "political reasons" to hold back. You are an individual - and your part in the greater whole is essentially a matter of who you are. If you have a legitimate attachment to someone I'd say its good to stick to that. Be it good or bad/right or wrong when it gets to the big picture. But if you're confused, keep asking; And your curiosity will take you either way!


See, ... logically ... words are entirely meaningless if their context is "dead". In that regard there only is 'God' as 'alive' - and everything else is just nonsense. God; Just as whatever alternative that may be presented; Is a construct of words and letters - and no matter how right all this is when related to the true God; Its as wrong when drawn towards a false alternative. "And they would say" ... or try to argue ... how to realize who the right one is; Which is a bit like trying to re-invent the wheel by telling you that we can't accurately figure out Pi. There are reasons to believe this; And reasons to believe that way. But if you're not looking for the true God - you'll get lost in words and meaningless arguments based on the same. And finding the true God by words alone ... is like trying to figure out physical reality without doing any experiments!

It used to be 'logical' that the earth is flat! And some hardcore believers may assume that "modern Astronomy" is an invention of Satan thus preferring to believe in a flat earth; While figuring out that it is a sphere - well - its certainly nothing a single individual (with little to no ressources) can (easily) do! So - thats where connections come into play; Where we will need to trust each other and each others capacities and capabilities on top of the willingness to do the right things!

Here to be precise we'd have to formulate it more absolutely. Like: The absolute/sole willingness to do the right things - as to say: If you're motivations are half-assed - or just there "for the clicks" - yea, nonsense it is - as even the Bible points out already. But I dislike formulating things that way because for once things usually aren't just as simple as that! At the very least is there a margin of tolerance we all need to have for each others individual imperfections; Including those of myself! The gist of my rambling here could be expressed as follows: What works best for you, as an individual, to connect to the creator! Like - it really depends on what your concerns are! One way would be: That "Anita Sarkeesian fake science cannot work because at some point we'd have to get rid of porn; And that for sure won't happen!".


On that note: There are plenty of artists who make arts specifically for children; Or for teenagers - and of course: A lot of art is about 'appealing to the eye' - like, need I write more?


Yea! Like: If you as an artist feel enlightened by pro-feminist agendas, such as to let that influence flow through yourself into the art you do - that doesn't contradict to the way things are! I mean - inspiration isn't an accurate thing. Especially noticable when playing Minecraft or something equivalent. You may have an idea that you then find out doesn't fit into the blocky nature of things. So you have to violate your inspiration in order to make the fantasy a reality! In a sense is 'pixel art' the epi-climax of that truth! (Or ultimately so when acknowledging Voxel art as equivalent).
But one has to be careful, because the feminist view isn't the only 'female standpoint' that there is!
So, thinking of basically 'mysogenistic porn' for instance - as 'wrong' as it would sound on this note; As viable of a mutual reality it yet portrays! Here the issue isn't one of 'fitting inspiration into reality' - but one of questioning whom you're trying to appeal to. If you're in for the money, the fame and the influence you're likely to make sacrifices that in essence are to the detrement of what you're doing. It might be the only way to go though; In this money driven world full of cock-blocking, trolling and yelling on the internet - and thats why I'd think of what "this" translates into as 'ideology'. So, an 'ideal' - that you can't always translate into reality; Just as its hard to do non-90-degree angled walls in Minecraft.


But on the other end is this just one of a great many things that I 'could' point out - which is what I would call: Trying to solve micro-confusions; And I don't think I can solve all of them - and so I shouldn't even attempt to properly solve this one! In that short section, no matter how much I try to 'round it', there are a lot of individuals that are supposedly there to do their own thing; Making their own judgements; And on the long run - they're supposed to find their own way. So - its not my concern! Just as I would do wrong by trying to 'score' either artpiece by my own standards. Sortof. I mean - art-criticism and all that; That is just a thing of the same kind. We can call it good or bad - and find backup for both assumptions. I would therefore go and say: Anything someone wants to exist; And 'can' exist; May exist! And so - people offended about Doom; In my oppinion; Can count themselves to the countless Monsters in that game; And go to where they come from in the same! (Which is Hell!)
This is maybe too general of a view - and does take us into the troublesome reality of 'only words'.
What we think can be expressed in words - and as simple as it gets: Your oppinion has an absolute value in regards to the truth! So, if you're - sorry - insignificant - thats what you are! And thats the point here!


Or in other words: Reality is more than a single person can hope to express! Even me! I mean - I do believe that some people have problems with me because I lack "the strength" to use absolutes where "necessary" - am 'too general' or 'not saying' - which to my understanding is however required if you want to cover as much reality in single sentences as possible! Like, you can't be properly 'covering' reality if you're bound to scientific accuracy because you have to consider that science isn't the magical 'right thing' - as; What is gravity? Any question regarding any of the yet unanswered mysteries of reality cripples your absolutistic approach or demand. There where "science is aware of that", there you get to similar non-absolute absolutes. And for the most part you can only specialize in fractions of reality - and that how a corrupt establishment is the worse thing we can have!


So - a bottom line? Breathe in, breathe out; And try to be at ease! I mean - thats I guess really the best advise I can give! I mean so to the 'average joe'. Anyone of infuence not so much! We might say: As with great power there comes great responsibility, and knowledge equals power, so comes with great lack of knowledge great irresponsibility - saying: Its not your fault if you can't tell any better! I mean - you have to figure on which side you wanna be. If you wanna be irresponsible - you got to give power to those who want to take it upon themselves! The more irresponsible you "want to be" - the more you have to narrow all the decisions that are to be made down to maybe even just 'one' that truely matters; And responsible - on the flipnote - the more responsible you want to be of everything; The more you have to establish on those 'narrow points' - so - it is in deed sometimes better to refuse to take part in any sort of word-flipping or trying to be smart for the sake of getting smart on the things that truely matter!



Let God be your guide - make Jesus your Teacher! Not indirectly - because, thats not how 'simple' works! You only know if someone is on your side if the basics line up! And soemtimes even that won't be enough! So you have to go to 'the absolutistic ONE ... basic ... thing - which is God'. And it don't get more basic than that!



Essentials!

by Christopher Nikolaus Sonnberger | 2017.02.13:57