Trying myself on a politics rundown of what I believe

When I started to think about Zion I was sure about one thing: "Fuck money". So I tried to think of a system which so happens to be based on 'resource management'; And ... I think I'll have to write a bit more extensively about that later down; But once I've gotten to a certain point I had to think of Economics more - and thats where I felt the whole 'no money' idea fall apart and crumble. Obviously I'm not doing any of that thinking based on 'empirical facts and research' - but based on what I feel - and so far my 'impressions' haven't ever been too far off from reality. Which is why I did evolve to being more 'ballsy' about expressing what I feel in a 'thats how it is - period' kind of way. (Don't try to do this at home kids!)


Its bad - and in fact - when it gets to other, less relevant topics, I really am on the other side of ... 'the luck'. There it really stands out how actually dumb and ignorant it is to do so. I mean, technically, arguably, I'm still right there too - but - not just "like that" - I mean, a lot of actual reasoning and changing the own mind and pondering goes/went into steering that boat onto a course I wouldn't/didn't feel ashamed about myself. And same might apply to this.



So, yea - lets start this by zooming into the 'no money' perspective. 'Resource Driven' it is - and yea, lot of it is good (which is why thats how things 'begin' - but right away I have to take a counter stance ... or not). I have my own words for given concepts; And they don't necessarily make sense without explenation. At the beginning we have what I liked to call 'the Esoteric base'. 'Esoteric' ... I would translate that into "inward-ish" - and in this context that simply put is the entirety of our race/species/cultures/livelyhood -> Existence - thought of in an abstract way - as perhaps an infinite plane without boundaries or any sort of outline. Just so the concept of 'humanity' as 'there' - like - the ancient archaic pool of goo that all biology emerged from.
'Esoteric' because its so a spiritual plane - hypothetical, thought of, metaphysical - "inward-ish" - and so, with the first emergence of culture we get to 'Logistics and Expansion'. Hunters and Gatherers sotospeak. Moving stuff from A to B to get something done - like a fence - or a kitchen of sorts, to have food in storage halls to survive the winter - stuff like that.

That LogEx isn't an institution at this point, obviously, as in a certain way LogEx is just some fancy term slapped onto 'what is'. Its what our governments are based on, emergent from, expanding on - and pretty much every endeavour, company, ... is LogEx in that regard. Its not that context which matters though. The only context relating to that is the Esoteric Base. So, you have it, its there - and my term for it is Logistics and Expansion. When now talking of politics and government in regards/comparison to "my Zion" - its pretty much almost all of the time a LogEx thing. It has nothing to do with religion, freedom of speech, etc., etc. and so on and so forth. And here the 'Resource Driven' base principle is that obviously - we don't need to transform resources into money to take them from where they are drafted to where they are needed; So, its a ... 'where is it needed?' question that basically reduces the effective costs involved into any Logistics to zero. Not if including this and that; But ... wait! When calling it LogEx all the Truck drivers and like were involved too - so - on the idea that: Person X drives a truck for LogEx and for that supports that system from which it gets what it needs to live. The person were doing it for 'free', but not. And the core perspective is really that pragmatic aspect of working together to get things 'done'. To so in the idea have the cost of everything reduced to zero.

My favourite example to shed further light on that would/must be Space Exploration. We have to 'assume'/imply a healthy economy from where we can extract the resources that are necessary - and it'd cost us 'nothing'.


Next things emerging from the Esoteric Base are 'Art & Culture', 'Military' and 'Priesthood' - and due to their inherant connection/dependency on LogEx we so grew accustomed to ... 'having' it that way. In regards to the 'Esoteric Base' those are yet however independent emergences ... 'people' that so didn't think in "ways of LogEx" - but - about Culture, about Defense, ... about Spirituality. So were 'Priesthood' what you'd think of if I coined the phrase 'Esoteric Base' without explenation. Yet the same could be told about Art & Culture.
When it gets to Religion and Freedom of Speech there is a split here. Relgion and Freedom of Speech are two different things. Religion here is though exchangable with the term 'Truth' or 'terms of Truth' - thus 'Priesthood' - a.k.a. 'those dedicated to watch upon us and the truth'. A&C is all about freedom of speech as about freedom in general. Its thus essentially also what remains of the Esoteric Base after sorting everything into these 'fractions'. It shouldn't ever be necessary for one fraction to call out the other - thats something not thought into 'the System' I have in the end - which however walks along the lines of ... 'not everything can be regulated' - and so is A&C not equal to Priesthood.

Safe to say: These fractions aren't about being solely part of one of them; Though fundamentally you'd find yourself based on either of them. But thats a thing where we also get to another side - where, the terms so far - of which, excluding the Esoteric Base, there are seven - are sotospeak 'the male side', and there's also to be a female one. Which I'll also certainly get to; Which is totally different in concept of design and philosophy.

So, theres LogEx, Military, A&C, Priesthood - then Management, Research and Development and finally Judges.


Judges are all about popularity. In a sense our modern day Politicians - however not restrained to Politics. I rather want to think of the romantic idealized image of the Sherrif or Superhero; Or 'Police'. Depending on where you're coming from you might also say 'Thugs' or "Gangsters". Maybe 'Secret Service' - more so the 'James Bond' version tho. Uhm - but in the core of everything its of the emergence of authority; As - politics in regards to interest groups; But ... that part of Art & Culture that goes beyond Art & Culture and basically leans more towards LogEx. We could take it into the Walking Dead ... and who you think were 'a Judge'? Its Morgan.
They aren't really there to say what to do because essentially that whole concept of Authority is ... no good. So the word 'Judge' is possibly a bit misguiding ... and its, I gather, easy to get Priesthood and Judges mixed up here. There is no "I'm a Judge and therefore you must" - its more like "we have a problem, so, what do the Judges say about it?".
Note: I feel its necessary to clarify a bit more how I come to these statements and conclusions. OK - you get the bottom line of it well enough I guess; That its mostly rather 'intuitive' than 'thought through' - yet so, the more time that passes be, the more its a feedback loop of intuition; And the number 7 is here a semi-inspired foundation. Its somewhere in those books - though not like: "This is about Government" - although the Chapter actually is like "This is about the Rulers" (Archons) - but - its not really obvious. To ... point out what matters tho:
As for the female side now - there's a symbol I have on mind rather than any footage in anything written ever - which is a trinity of three rings. So, locked into each other. Like a triangle; And mostly is about the in-between - family stuff - 'life in general' - 'civil interest' - and is by design not well defined - as opposed to the male side. The most simple of all concerns there to grasp might be a Museum. It'd drop into the A&C department - but its more of a public service thing thats neither art nor culture per se ... although thats what it might be all about. But ... lets not get ahead of ourselves.

We can have this '7-fold Democracy' alongside anything else. We can think of it as an MMORPG or a Forum or a poll - and something as an identity Label; And have that influence our "mainstream politics" - such as that our LogEx people would be politicians in concerns of infrastructure, Judges, Priests and Free Speakers all in the same - and thats where we can start to see the pragmatic meaning behind these fractions. Its all about 'purpose' ... and that without 'selfishness' - as each of them is selfish towards a public cause - while being homogenous to an individuals orientations and profficiencies.

Something to dedicate to. You so could be ... I have to think of Neil DeGrasse Tyson or Bill Nye as R&D guys - where Neil is more R&D and Bill is more Priesthood/Judge. I'd probably say Judge and take Richard Dawkins in as Priest - ironically. That fits ... as, thinking of the 'words' they utter; Bill is really more of a Judge than a Priest - where Richard is quite down to the point of Priesthood - as Neil ... R&D all the way - though there so more on the female side.

These Labels do get important when we get to institutionalizing things - but yea ... this so far does actually quite cover the needs I felt to write this for.




Its however safe to say that the more uncertain you are about where to find yourself here, the more you're on the female end of things. And there isn't much that can be done or pre-determined about any of this - but I do certainly feel like we need Judges first of all. I mean ... thats the first thing that would show helpful and wouldn't really compile into much of an institution rather than a social label - as - more of a profession. I ... lets move on.



The next segment would be on Economy - but I feel like there is not much of a need. There's the 'no money' premise and the 'value of things' to deal with ressources - ... - but I'll end this on a note I ended this before ... which is: "Give it to the people". Thats how its supposed to roll in the end anyway; As thinking of my concept of 'the One': The one is not necessary in all of this - though there is a position that I'd leave which someone would inherit; Which I labelled as 'Delta Commander'. Sounds fancy. Its more of a "Jack of all Trades" position as 'backup function' that doesn't really matter - at least could I not specifically tell you what its about; other than calling it "passive watcher" - and "passive watchers" - but ... in that range of things; I feel like I have to say that its legit to think of this as a pattern where you are actually supposed to come up with your own label. I ... mean ... if you know what your 'place' is - its possibly not one of those 7 terms, but something you do - its possibly something. Even if you find yourself just being more of a communications node. Like, if you even just consume - you're actually already doing 'work'; Which is how I like to think of my friend Martin. He's a movie geek - he's into a lot of things and I owe a lot of my 'cultural education' to him, when it gets to movies. And ... even games. He's communicative, though some might consider him shy, ... it all depends. So ... taking him for what he is would possibly not benefit everyone - like, there's a chance you just don't care about any of the stuff he cares about - to me, he's a "view extender" of sorts. Arguably a small guy in the bigger picture - amongst the smallest - but still a part of the clockwork of the things going on. Yea, thats A&C I'd say - but yhp ... I digressed.
So - I'm there because someone has to be there to name these things - so people can respond to it. That might just be anyone - but it really has to be someone, some 'one', so there's a way to get people on the same page. Else we'll have many that contend about becoming that 'one' - and none could be entirely trusted. We'd eventually get to popularity contests costing millions and millions of dollars only allowing the most influencial people to speak up ... where I'm gonna lay it into priests mouths that they got to be on the same page as me! And so the Delta Command comes to make sense. They would be in the position of easy access to things that matter - and have to buffer public interest and point things out they feel need to be pointed out 'beyond' the things that are oppinion driven. Yet their work would stay in the background - even when transparent to the public. And there goes the difference between 'me' as is and 'me' as "could/should/would" be - that I don't assume that 'aaaaaall' of that work thats here dispensed amongst 'everyone' is actually 'my' duty!
And so is it my duty to be 'the guy' preventing that the internet shitstorming as of today to take this over. Well - yea - I can't! But - there's God who would say who's cool and who isn't - and that Unification ... is so 'sowed' by me - and there are people with audience that would qualify as 'judges' that would so be 'officially judges' then - as opposed to the entire rest who would want to be that but can't because they ain't cool with dear Jesus! Yea, its ... arguably 'nothing' but a label sortof made official by some public recognition of my persona - but if people are looking for reason ... well - there then is 'us' and the rest - and we ain't gonna change the playground ... and you judge for yourself! Try listening to the Amazing Atheist - I really feel like ... he's a good example. I'm quite sure that there's little to nothing in the way of him being cool with God ...
And yea - thats a stance I'm standing behind! This one video maybe isn't enough to truely convey why I think he's a cool dude - but, the thing is that he pretty much has a stance against all sorts of horseshit - which to me is a judges work; As so - he's judging. Sortof. He isn't supposed to be PC - he basically tears nonsense apart so that won't ever be a thing. I mean, we don't need an army of him - thats not the point or the issue or case here. He's 'one' face - and he speaks 'for' reason. The only thing you could respond in this regard would be to go out of your way and be smart about the true problems you're trying to get at; And he'd be coming back at ya until he ultimately has to agree. And it'd be 'us' - the people - listening to him that gave any kind of power to that. So, being on board with me and showing that is what this would come down to. You'd do it out of your confession and though that wouldn't tell a lot to people initially -
- its not my work to promite the reasons you have for being with me. And from this angle this isn't going anywhere. Of course this dude won't kickstart this to any capacity. I'm not really sure which incentives he had at this point to speak up for this. So there's the idea that "we" could go to his house and try to cinvince him to support "our" cause ... and yea, maybe, but ... thats not how it'd work - unless 'this and that' happened and so we get back to something, a context, to relate to. If he however already knows about this - who I am - the whole thing is different. Then the "sellout" accusation would come from the other direction; But ... that type of nonsense - whatever. My argument here is that I don't really want to manufacture any of this - it also works just the way its supposed to. Let people judge on their own and choose on their own - where in regards of the Amazing Atheist what I have to say is rather that I'm confident that he's a man of reason that would eventually come to an understand that would disallow him from holding back on supporting me/"us" - seeing an opportunity maybe in getting 'more views' - which is what this is all about! More views for that which deserves it. Not for money, but to outgrow the bullshit online. Like 'Morgan' from the Walking Dead he has reasons "for being as he is" - as Morgan wouldn't just turn into a murderer due to argument - it requires more ... something that changes him inside to do what he objects to out of reasons that make sense to him. That so he won't change due to the change - but grow instead. Same goes for every Atheist, Agnostic and Believer out there!

What I really need to emphsize - thats why I previously thought of making a fool of myself - is that I don't want to be overglorified. Thats bad! I'm not 'wanting' anyone to be in a need to ask me for what they "have to" say - quite the contrary is the case! And I'd rather act up as the biggest moron there is on this planet to get you upset on your toes against me - than doing myself what I have high up on my 'despised' list, which is to give up my free mind in submission to someone elses oppinion. When it gets to Kink the whole thing is obviously a totally different story and won't effect ... this kind of stuff.

There would be a list of officially recognized Judges - and that today would be YouTube. It would be the go to place ... though once there will be too many; Being a judge were more of a Uniform you're wearing so ... yea, whatever works. To just say - thats what matters; Thats what people need to want - Tanks, Healers and Damage Dealers; And of course I'm constantly on the lookout - to write something that'd do the trick of making it easy for folks to access what I have to share - but as it stands at this point; I come to write stuff and thats littered with 'that' kindof stuff - here and there - and ... I can't quite tell what I was writing and thinking about last week! And there I sense a problem - regarding my (hi)story - or details regarding reasons, why this is as it is or that - but thats also why my emphasis is towards God - and the issue of God being the Teacher, the one that empowers people to do good stuff, ... and as a/your 'brother' or 'sister' most of those details shouldn't even matter. It really comes through here tho - that there is a purpose to me and whether I'm doing a good or a bad job at it - comes down to what my job 'is'. The loudest complaints I get whenever I take this position is one of the things that constantly pushes me to move on and forward ... as the Bible also basically tells me that I'm gonna be a bit of a ... welll, celebrity of course - beloved - and I don't mean to take a dump on that!
Just saying that the narrative as for what matters has a way of circumventing that; As to speak of me as of the role that I inherited.

And oh yea - whats gonna be official? I mean - there's what 'will be' and what 'could be' - and what worked out pretty well for me so far is to ... well, this is gonna go down a road ... well, I'll get to that then ... make up your own mind and understand that if God wanted it any different ... you'd find yourself in an odd position. Its a thing a 'Zaelot' would do - doing Gods will no matter what - yet opposed to the general issue of having a free mind.

Where this gets weird is when we're moving away from thinking of profession ... and get to things like sexual desires. Lets just call everyone who has a YouTube Channel based on oppinion a Judge - and people disagree with each other. As of yet there is no Priesthood but me - and most Judges are independent entities not connected to a 'higher consensus' - and yea, doesn't make much of a difference as thats whats supposed to happen. So there are judges that oppose and Judges that defend pedophilia - for instance; And I'll focus on that topic specifically.
If however there now were this 'higher consensus' and we had judges of both sides - just a sidenote - either side were forced to pay a bit more respect to the other. And out of respect I'm gonna listen to Beethoven while I'm writing this - so I'm not get anyone "tainted" with some "Jinx" of this or whatever.

Its funny to have seen Undoomeds reaction to someone who confessed to Pedophilia as, its pretty much ... just hate-speech. To say, the arguments against Pedophilia are emotional for the most part - and I can understand that because I used to feel the same way about it. There isn't much to say about that though, as it is what it is and we either share the same kind of aggression in opposition to it, or we're part of that minority that doesn't. But well, there's the issue of consent of course thats really the main reason to condemn pedophilia - as - it should be a matter of fact part of our understanding ... relative to respect. And there is no 'downplaying' that. Matter of fact - we probably need a word for that ... "the art of saying the one thing but doing the other" - ... hypocrisy? Kindof. I however think more of the 'pursuit' than the action. Same thing - ... well, anyhow. So, saying "this is what we should do" - to so get into a leading position to then implement backdoors/exceptions/stuff to bypass all of the whole. "Backsidedness"?
Or "backfacedness"?
And if you're really a harsh pedophilia opposer let me tell you: You'll possibly accuse me of being backfaced - and I basically give you that to now stand on and be upset about me.

I so also want to skip on the rhetoric as I've also written about this subject various times - but I think its best to again feature this subject in a prominent position than have it linger around in the darkened background.

To be properly backfaced I at first need my "fake narrative" - the one you're gonna come to agree with. But so I'll get straight to the 'backdoor' - but I dare not to use words such as 'nuance'. So, how to go about it? If we legalized Pedophilia - we get to a whole lot of trouble round about the issues of 'how' any 'relationship' of that sorts could ever be considered fair. Its from the get go basically invoking the judgement of a mature person upon a child - and if we said its the parents rights to decide - well - thats a huge open door for Child prostitution. The plotpoint is quite simple: For any legality to exist that involves two parties, both parties have to be capable of 'self-defense' - thats why there is something as a set age prior to which an individual isn't considered capable of signing a contract. And because Love is complicated even so to adults - ... and because adults are the source of all irresponsibility ... - Pedophilia really isn't a thing we should want to sympathize with. We should object even to a mature individuals love interests - at least being skeptical when appropriate - and assuming that a child could handle it any better is like ... yea, ... I mean ... a person that acknowledges being pedophile is like commiting to that irresponsibility - and is at that the unchallenged 'first' on the list that a noble minded person should or would condemn. In competition we can see older people getting their asses handed to them by the younger ones ... and so we can look at it from a perspective of sportsmanship. Treating a child with the same harshness as an adult; Expecting the same of them; Thats wicked. Or to say it differently: An adult who gets itself into trouble and then gets its ass handed over to himself knew what he/she got him/herself involved into - but we can't say the same of youngsters. There may be cases where people are smart enough about different things to imply that they pretty damn well know/knew what they are doing and could go as far as applying the full weight of the law on them - but there is yet the factor of immaturity that needs to be considered.
Zion, this whole idea here, is setup in a way ... so my earlier drafts ... that would allow for a better protection of children. The key thereto is healthcare. And even once a child was taught to not say anything - it can be cheated into yet revealing the truth to us - so also psychology. And I want to make sure that I emphasize that this is on the list of things that matter to me. However ... 'we' do 'not' believe that a child is a blank slate! And thats where the counter-narrative comes in. If you so happened to then be a Judge of Zion - this is only your concern until its a concern of the divine. Once there is a final stance of the Priesthood you ain't bound to that per se, but you are 'required' to take it to God - and either you'll like the answer or you wont.

How to become a Judge of Zion?
... dodgy issue! :P

I wouldn't mind if you wanted to document all and everything from start to finish ... regarding your process to Unification. 'Full Disclosre' - every conversation - a Baptism certificate - well - anything you could want to later have us at our ballsacks is fine for me. The only thing that I'm worried about is if you're gonna be like "Oh, I'm in" while everyone else can't really acknowledge that. Then you're by our standards 'not' in - and I'll briefly explain how that works:
'Getting in' is also described as 'breaking the 9th Seal' and that one is through the Experience of Gods unification with you through a manifestation of the force that is as the first sound of a music piece. We could call it "the swoosh" - and while that would kindof allow you to assume that once the swoosh happened that its gone - the Force is not gone - the swoosh was sotospeak just comparatively loud to whats 'normal' so that you for once have an actual "oha" experience - and the swoosh is what allows others that are 'in' already to see that you're in too. If you then wanted to claim that we betrayed you - well - you're free to do so and take that to whomever is listening to you - where I'm countering my worries through hope; That if any of that should happen to us its only gonna be of temporary effect.
And if you then are in and you want to be a Judge - then you are a Judge of Zion. So - if you were in and you wanted to be a Judge, you couldn't ever be like: But they won't let me. Yet so you should understand why it is important to me that there is some unity - so that if you claim to be in, out of independent effort for instance, you have a legitimate source to back that up!

At any rate - my stance as an individual is that it is a thing, I'm in, it works and I want you to know that!

As of me the official stance of the Priesthood to that subject is the following: For any pre-mature individual to be considered as legally subject to sexual conduct that individual has to be verified as subject to sexual conducts by divine decree. So, its a status one must acquire - and in the sense - yea, as branding cattle. Those individuals would be part of a more or less dedicated community if no exceptions exclude that individual from that rule - but outside of that there is no way of arguing for pedophilia! Naturally the first ones to get branded that way would be subject to scientific interest - and I would count myself to them, but I haven't been - as far as I know - been subject to child abuse.
So I can only narrate on that topic from an 'in hindsight' perspective and am pretty much only able to base my understanding on asumptions.
This process of verification would be conducted by an authorized circle of individuals that are given "the stamps" sotospeak - and for once is it a circle because the human being is still considered as fallable - and due to that the existence of those people is in no way an argument to prevent you from requesting an indpendent response from God. After all - once you're unified with God ... pretty much everything you do or think about is directly invoking Gods presence ... so ... this circle of people is only an official capacity to that extent.

As for how these testimonies are being obtained - theres the way of me telling you how I do it, but thre's also another way. Take a long walk and ask God about it!

This ... now ... doesn't eliminate free speech - it only adds 'solid facts and figures' to free speech - and if you were a Judge of Zion and yet felt the need to discuss this or any other topic - that is pretty much wanted! Like so - talking of science - those were things you could have thoughts about - and they shouldn't just be talked about. Something that I wanted for myself is that 'power' - to know - to get clarification - to see something move in response to my interest. To say: This should be looked at - to then have people ready to look at it, ... or cueing it up ... as what sucks about having a fringe position as this one is being thought of as though I'd want to hide anything. While yet you have to understand that running around with an action-cam 24/7 isn't what I'd want either!


So, in my oppinion are there 'many' reasons why you would want to be 'in' - or a Judge - and whatever your agenda is - "make it so"! Except you want to fuck my face with your fist - and such - I might wanna defend myself there!


And this is from 'David' - the most Legendary of all Warlords! Just ... sayin'!


But that is yet another thing. I'm ... many things and many people ... and you would wanna know that from God independently - to have me officially acknowledged in 'your' book of divine facts, but someone would have to be there to make that more official - and that isn't gonna be me! I'm pretty much proposing that - bringing it to "them" - and "they" - they wouldn't exist until we exceeded well enough beyond the number of 12 so we can assess that these 12 are truely inheriting that position and not just there so due to a lack of numbers. Its voluntary - but obviously a little different than becomming a Judge! Although a Judge isn't really doing anything different - in that regard. Its however not their 'primary obligation'.

But yea ... all I got left to add is some rant about ... I mean, can I call everyone who didn't get this from the start a 'dumbfuck' now? Or mentioning that it did take a hideous amount of time and effort to effectively 'debunk' the "backfaced" argument on me saying that I'm sexually submissive and devote. And maybe that isn't even done yet. This "closing statement" was however intended to be rather short. You know - "the power is yours" - end of the line. Of course that doesn't stress that I do believe that 'this chaos' that we have today is capable of living up to those expectations; You got to pick up your stuff ... sotospeak ... thats stored in the armoury of God. Peace!



Jabam!

by Christopher Nikolaus Sonnberger | 2017.03.19 | 04:29