I've seen the movie - and its awesome! (A bit cringeworthy at times, ... but credits for trying!)
I don't wanna discuss it - or talk or write about it - nor do I really want to get intricate with Cybernetics and all of
that stuff, ... but because its in the title I'm gonna say this: Its not so much that there is stuff missing from the Anime,
but that it uses the same pictures to tell an entirely different story; And so you can watch 'em both and not have the same
experience. Its awesome! And I was high when watching it. (Technically the film is a prequel to the Anime, except you take
it into the nerdie depths. Bet then there ... its kindof getting wishy washy with the pseudo sciences that cover up the fact
that real science doesn't give us any answers just yet.)
But no - what I'm actually here to get at is more on those exclamation mark thingies - and at least when I'm actively try to
see anything I can see anything I want in anywhom I want. So, in case it wasn't clear enough already - take those things with
a grain of salt, aaand - I possibly should look further into: Why.
But other than that - there's also this:
and this blogger - thats something I was concerned about for some time. So, thanks to Undoomed for bringing it up!
I guess.
When skimming through a given time-split of that stuff I wrote here, you might find the Blogger in a way ... oddly summarizing
what I've myself kindof advocated here. Though, there's a small difference there - as, saying that 'we are all stupid' changes
the required implications of 'stupidity' than as opposed to yelling 'smartprivilege'. But then 'smartprivilege' is also another
thing that I was ... I recently just finally got to express that. I guess I did try to do so at another point as well. The whole,
whatever I'm good at, there's always somebody better than me - part.
But calling it 'smartprivilege' and making it out like that - ... - that makes it sound really bad! And yea - there's that thing
- where I feel that a whole lot of stuff like that exists - like, anything I say is somehow converted into dumbshit like that -
and people riff on it for obvious reasons - and it kindof does have an impact on me - astair ... basically.
Same goes for shitty game-devs. So, folks that make shit games, get hate on the internet, act like a bunch of morons, get even
more hate, and then whine about it. And though I never published a game, I kindof feel as though I'm being looked at.
When you read through the start of the recent article, down to me mentioning Mazes and Monsters, thats me basically trying to
avoid looking delusional or crazy - that on a similar basis as noticing these odd summaries - so - I think kindof like avoiding
to drop into a certain narrative. So I guess I can take this then as a trophy ;).
And then Undoomed also leaves us with a note. There are only a few to whom its basically given, yet most acquire their education
through hard work. And I guess thats something I overlooked.
Anyhow - there is a lot of weirdness going on - and the 'Butenshai Xzi' - wo how - welcome back! I mean ... technique kindof
delivers the point I'm going to make here. Well, what is the 'Butenshai Xzi' technique? I've come up with it being high some time
back ... and effectively it describes a mental destillation progress wherein similar to Bruce Lees philosophy or any filtration
mechanism "good stuff is kept and bad stuff expelled" - simply put.
Now, I maybe want you to express your inward understanding of your mind right now - so we get sure to the point that you and I
have different Levels of conception. Taking it really seriously I might give you a list of relevant understandings that you might
find yourself on par with - but ... it so far however seems to be a mystery to get a proper "solid state" idea of what our mind
is, what our memories are ... the whole spiritual/psychological "event" of the brain if you so will - on the other side of that
'event horizon' - so closer to the personal cognitive 'happening' - where the 'ego' is truely 'whole' we might say, where the
summ of it all gets reflected unto as one by our own one mind. So, there in the idea is something like a knot - it ties what we
are together - and around that knot there is an "inner sphere" - the emergence of that 'one mind' that is also however bound to
that knot.
Now, however we see it - I find it safe to consider [[ ]1]: that "there in the center" we all have void space. So, instead of there
being an obvious bright glowing 'knot'/spot of some kind we inwardly as "behind our eyes" have a void. Thoughts of the mind in the
verbal kind emanate from on top - where our brain is at - "supersticion" and 'metaphysical "contemplation"' comes in from left and
right, ... and everything beneath is sortof our body. Oh, and dreams come in from the back of our head.
Secondly I find it equally safe to tell that [[ ]2]: We don't know where our memories are. At the very least do we not consciously
address our memory, as a computer would need memory to be able to tell which memory its accessing, ... which is a redundancy.
In our 'void' we're dealing with ideas - in regards to which I'd say [[ ]3]: Our mind can be compared to a stream of consciousness
- consciousness being as the summ of a whole - fractionally accessible to our active consciousness, regarding which we can drag in
comparisons of gravity or magnifiers. Perhaps mirrors - some crystaline field of interactions between logic and information.
I would assert that {{ }1}: The Crystaline appearance that I get reflects the conscious growth where now over time "blips" emerge
from the active surface based on the surfaces interaction with other parts of the structure - whereby a 'piece of surface' can be
compared to a triangle of a 3D mesh.
As opposed to IQ there then is the measurement: "BPS" (Blips per second). Or on lower ranges, BPH or BPM. Maybe BPY.
Each blip can also be compared to the popping of a bubble in a sheet of foam.
Possibly BP(tu) fluctuate over time.
Blips essentially would compare to a growing consciousness - ... yet anyhow.
On that basis I find it rather self-understood to conclude that (( )1): Our mind can be considered a "Virtual Entity" that doesn't
exist in plain physical conditions. Counter reflections furthermore ... .
So, that is part one - or 'the observable' - while, deeper down we have to assume (( )2): There is something that makes certain
things more relevant than others - so, ideologies for instance. Here [[ ]4]: Belief is an energy that we can use to "move things
around" - or "strengthen" as "weaken", in regards to which [[ ]5]: We also have 'focus' that automatically enhances our conscious
interaction with our mind unto certain topics.
Going deeper, we must find that [[ ]6]: We also have 'mood' which compares to a densified and simplified understanding of the world
around us; And relates to our own individual intellectual well being within it; Partially influenced by our Biochemistry; In terms
of which we may come to speak of "our heart".
[[ ]7]: Also connected to belief there is imagination.
Think of an atom - and you're most likely to think of a representation you have seen before. Well "duh" - because you can't naturally
see it with your eye and whenever speaking about it, those representations are used instead. But so there comes a point where your
reality is in the hands of an artist - or in that of your fear!
See, the thing with science is that the drawings are there to visualize the reality behind the things that work. Like using a down
pointed arrow to represent gravity. I know, there are people out there that don't believe in gravity - but I'm damn sure we can all
believe in that down-pointed arrow! So there is a reality to letting loose of an object while holding it in mid air. So there is a
reality to dropping a bottle into a black hole. And there we get to issues like 'gravity' - speaking of a more specified understanding
of that down-pointing arrow. Faith in science is about faith in people doing their work, 'that' work, of keeping track of what we
know and using it so we can all benefit from it. But, well, yea ... isn't that an ironic note ... sortof ... social critique esque?
But so is 'politics' a real thing - governments are a 'real' thing, 'political power and influence' is. Thats ... very real!
And so we say "our brain does" - where being totally accurate here we'd rather have to say: "our mind does" ... for instance ...
connect images to ideas or experiences. Like TV=Fantasy, YouTube=Bullshit. Ergo: Politics=Fantasy, Science=Bullshit.
That so when these are the 'weaker' terms, or not 'strong enough' to turn things around. Or YouTube=Freedom Trump=Freedom.
??? - Anyhow. 'Mind' as the 'Virtual Entity' "of our brain", where the two are somehow bound together and we don't entirely know where
to draw the line; As of which [[ ]a]: Mind and Brain are technically synonymous.
With 'mood' and "heart" we however dive deeper - where the term 'mind' still holds up, but 'brain' looses weight.
[X[ ]1]: Enframed within our heart, practically, we have what I can call 'the Motivator' - something like a fifth hand governing our
motivation and emotional navigation. Depending on how we set it up we can filter between relevant and irrelevant information. It
can be determined by our faith, but we can also use it to determine our faith. Faith is here our primary concept of reality - be it
atheistic or not. The Butenshai Xzi XD technique ... or because you can't say that without cringing together lets say ... Jet Kune
Do ... or conscious filtration technique ... whatever - you have to motivate yourself to let go of bullshit. As of that you'll amass
an amount of what we might call "sobriety" - and through a given amount of wisdom you'll be able to expand on it as knowledge through
which 'the Motivator' (Motivator Alignment Technique) gets re-enhanced and aside of only letting go of bullshit it can more confidently
amass information.
Which means - things I can't solve right now eventually fade into the background and maybe some day I'll come back to it.