Leaning further out the Window - part 2
In other words: I've had way too much running through my mind the last few days to make easy and proper sense of; As ontop
of the usual I've opened this can of worms that's keeping me occupied.
One thing on my mind being, than rather than transphobic and the such, people may as well just be idiots. And I'm not sure
whether or not being transphobic by accident - so, out of stupidity - should count as such. Technically it should - as that's
the whole point in a nutshell. But it seems like there's a problem with this; Because if we in the pursuit of truth now have
this compass ... or anti-compass per chance ... a disturbance is being introduced, somewhat aligned with matters of undermining
the concept of objective reality.
Truths can be used as part of hyperbolic statements to produce a lie, being however on some level factual; While Lies can be used
as part of hyperbolic statements to produce a truth, being however on some level bullshit. I was provided with one example thereof in
my YouTube recommendations this morning; Whereby the transphobic argument builds on the fact that we are a dimorphic species -
and the pro-trans argument builds on the fact that this dimorphism exists on a spectrum and is further riddled with complications.
Hereby it would seem that the pro-trans side has gotten used to the transphobic side resorting to wild hyperbole to make their case -
and did in turn resort to wild hyperbole to refute that. In that turn of events then, one might try to point out the flaws in the
dimorphic system, possibly forgetting that the dimorphism is real - thus having potentially stepped into a lie to create a hyperbolie
that can then be refuted based on the lies constructing it. [
Link to Video
example]
Now, I don't think there's much I can do about that. But it's going to sort itself out eventually.
What I did however notice, is that along having left [unnamed terror] undefined - the "pariah amongs their peers" part may be a bit
weak. And to me it seems like I have to work on my philosophy underpinning this whole thing. In that sense I'm under the impression,
that something is 'too' invasive when it interferes with other things, such as the whole truth-compass issue. I mean, there's
wiggle room, I assume - so that when I make things about myself, it's not a truth-compass anymore. So the Queens Blessing - as it
does more specifically pertain to me rather than neutral truth. I was wondering whether I should update that.
If now the "target" were neutral truth or not - wouldn't make much of a difference when people could read it as non-neutral for instance,
or just ignore it for some other reason. Also can neutral "ends" be hijacked more easily, and ... at some point I have to stop pretending
like this whole experiment is a neutral pursuit. I mean, it is neutral - but I do play a significant part in it; SO much so that actually
it mustn't be neutral in that regard.
As it then stands, it would seem as though people can still choose to be ignorant - and that giving them an out when they choose not to be
is perhaps as good as it gets. This also reminds me of something that I read in a book. Some kind of prophecy I might as well have
hallucinated. But it therein speaks of a group of people who will seek out falsehoods - that they experience the signs that are to advise
them against that - and that at some point that is however also a geological problem. It suggests as much as that there's nothing anyone
could do - leaving the impression that it'll melt away eventually.
Like so, among fake people who are used to be fake towards each other all the time, what difference does it make that they will be pariahs
to each other? Or anything. "Pariah" is already pretty much ... the apex of where that (social ostracization) could go.
And somehow wound up in all this is the problem of mind-glitches. I've touched upon it in my book, in the part on TFGs, where outside of
our sphere of immediate physicality we're free to layer whatever worldview upon things. Like so, if you want to read me as evil, it doesn't
matter what would how try to convince you of the opposite. At least in a worse case scenario.
This holds that we can tell with pretty much certainty, where "the deceiver" is gonna hide. Maybe it's not quite that simple, but either
way - I think I'd be better off focusing on defense - and beyond that on the more positive things that can be of value "in the meantime".
But as for "being pariah's amongst their peers" - I mean that a part of that is, that they're making a fool of themselves. So it doesn't
necessarily take a peer to recognize that. And maybe so, even, that they can be a truth-compass in a sense. That however rather based on
the work they put into being one. [shrugs]. But yea, that's of course ... the way of things. When people say stupid shit, eventually they
produce wisdom, even if only by proxy and in as far as someone is there, capable of making sense of it. So did a lot of good things come
from the defeat of Nazi Germany - good things that maybe wouldn't have happened otherwise. Though, if people hadn't been that stupid, we
might also have gotten those good things a lot sooner.
So, for the time being ... that is that ... . The things foretold within the initial document on this experiment ... well ... I don't know
just yet. We'll see. To me, that is a different topic at this point.
Peace!
Or is it?
As opposed to the Karmic Negatives, there are the Karmic Positives. Compassion, honest Scientific inquiry, Democratic Principledness, righteous Tolerance
and diversified Fairness to name some. And people who align positively with them, shall be blessed in their confidence and wisdom and resolve and ability
to inspire, to manifest the positives thereof.
Amen!
To be continued ...