My Choice: The Anti-Trans Agenda

Or ... some such thing.

I'm a woman. I think ... then I think not ... then I wonder why ... but eventually it comes back around to it. Like ... it matters not. But it does. Or so ... something did.

Eventually it clicked for me. When I think to myself, as though I would say it out loud, that I'm a woman, something ... eventually feels off. There just happen to come moments where ... it's like a wrench is clogging the mechanism. And it gets me to question things. But what I found is ... that the question: "What is a Woman?" - can be answered in some sort of a profound and meaningful way. To do so, one has to however look at the data, and it's not like anyone hasn't yet herd of "The Transes" and "Corrupted Science" - so, the ability to look at what's behind those issues is actually there and somehow presented.

See ... woman talk: Whoever you are, you know that there are these and those. There are those that you look up to and those that you look down upon. There are these things that you deem natural, perchance somewhat sacred and incorrubtible aspects of your femininity, that you judge others by. Like ... what's that Outfit, what are those shoes, what's up with that hair - or most importantly: Does the form go with the vision.
But we're all different. And even the rules and the group associations we have for ourselves don't always line up with others within any one of those vague rules and associations.
So, what is a woman?
And - so I struggle when I think that a woman ought to be this "one uniform thing". Where what that "one uniform thing" is - is in some sense yet again up to however one thinks of it. And in actuality, this is the deception. Or a deceiving aspect. I would think of what I think a woman is - as some flickering hypocricy - and so it looks like it's a personal understanding, but is nonetheless bigoted. Like so, when I apply this "what I want to be" onto myself and I find that the two don't line-up, I get confused. Like, at least am I no Damsel. There are like ... parts of my identity or personality that don't translate well into this current iteration of my existence.

So, what ultimately matters behind it all, for me, is myself. As for myself. Like - I'm not "that kind of a woman".

We could, with varying degrees of reason, take these thoughts to make some trans jokes, or rather gender remarks, of them. But it is in fact not strictly required to do so. Unless there is like ... a real precedent that would require further analysis ... .

But ... so came here to push some anti-trans agenda. Actually. Yea. Like so are we not only not strictly required to consider trans-issues in this instance, but we can further stress, that trans-issues should be resolved through the transition. However, if the transition was the wrong tool for the problem at hand ... that's no good. So, it would be good to have a sample size of either group analyzing age- and background-group specific transition trends. Long term.

As in: Doing what needs to be done. That isn't, or shouldn't be, the issue. The issue is, that people try to say that we ... try to 'tempt' people into "the LGBTQ Agenda" - as via whatever deep hidden sexual tensions there might be. And maybe there are some. But to me, the thing is ... it's not only deep hidden sexual tensions that bother me. Whatever bothered me sure wasn't a 'maybe'. Though, having hidden and boxed it away, it kind of was one for a few moments in time.
Anyway ...


That's my point here though. That ... there's a spectrum. Like ... 100%Gay -to- 0%Gay. But we can narrow that spectrum down by further specifying what we mean by Gay. This is a mental exercise, though people are arguably working on a technological solution, which at first draws upon one's own experiences with the matter.
Now, with such things on mind we can try to draw a 'way'. Like - we take certain things "we would never" - and see if there's a way how we individually could ever do with whatever those things are. And the more such ways you end up drawing, that are decidedly Gay, the "never" stops being much of a hard no. And this is where we come to what we might call "the Unravelling".

That is where the individual might 'Fall' - as "from Grace" - as if all of their 'nevers' all of a sudden became "ever"s. But that's basically a psychological trap. But more to the point is it a cultural thing - where one's attempts to "fit in" with the heteronormative ground does no longer work. The thing is that once an individual starts to "unbox itself" - it's like a blossoming in which a concept of "self-accuracy" starts to dominate other cultural perceptions. And so, if one finds themself in a world that demonizes them, they would thusly suffer a certain tendency towards looking for another side to things.
Say, within a Heteronormative environment different social cues and stuff are important when compared to a Queer one. Different traits matter - or are prioritized. But that possibly is a ... temporaly shifting abstract ... depending on societal norms for once.

What is implied therein is some individual drive - maybe something that cis-people take for granted. Because, what this drive provides - or entails - as an inevitable positive/negative attitude towards things. Where an individual that is like only 1% gay, could easily squash that out of their existence - as per happenstances; Thus having like homophobic particles about them, maybe. Like 1%. Or whatever. Or, similarly me! While I'm moving towards my ideal, I'm practically required to eventually squash some things out over others.
In a cultural context ... me doing that might seem strange. Weird enough so people might ... have all sorts of ideas about what's going on. As for what's actually going on, possibly involves an individual struggle with the cultural weights upon their shoulders. Like ... an exercise in favor of emotional health, and the so called "rejection of the Patriarchy".


The end.

PS: God is as straight as a Line and He does have good Taste!