Hmm ... don't get me wrong, it's not quite that simple. But also - I'm a modern, left leaning,
post WW2, german Trans Woman; And so my rhetoric might come accross as a little unorthodox at
times.
I wear this video here as a badge of how much of a woke-pilled [enter randomly large array of
slurrs] I am. I mean, this is a sensitive topic. All of it. Anything that involves a certain kind
of person. And I'm weak. I'm the kind of person that might just drown of their own saliva. I have
a lot of reasons to feel scared, intimidated and all that - like so: The Bible calls me a worm.
And yet ... this worm is here to teach folks a bunch of lessons and re-arrange the world a bit.
And the lesson here is ... well, I'm sorry for this clickbait-y title (-_-) and, @Conservatives
but Liberals please understand and bear with me: "I can understand if you're afraid of this
"Liberal Demon" or at least uncomfortable enough to not want to support any of it"
- but more importantly it's actually about predicting the future.
And we're all guilty of it, more or less - though I will say, that in some places it's more
outrageous than in others. And if you paid attention you understand a few of the mechanisms at
play.
Knowing what is to come can help us navigate. But we don't ever really know what will come. But we
try to apply our understanding ... arguably ... and yet, if I wanted to argue that Aliens will come
and visit us, I could.
More realistically however, I might have to contend with the issue that Religions aren't supposed
to participate in political activism? Did I get that right? And due to one-sided law-enforcement,
you know ... I can't be too sure about what that may mean for me.
Or us. I mean, we may have to become a little more creative than I originally anticipated.
Or I might learn to properly redact certain terms. So, using the term 'Fascism' more deliberately,
such as to also not really imply any "real life (contemporary)" political movement. Uhm ...
Resolutions of Faith
Predicting the future is a little bit like math. Sometimes it is as easy as 1+1, other times it might
make your typical "look at all this math" white-board in a movie look like it's just 1+1. But so
there are also these two ways. In actual math you'd try to break things down into simpler pieces -
while in "movie math" you'd add lots and lots of unnecessary constants and variables to make it look
smarter.
But yea. Math also happens to be 'actual' mental gymnastics, at least some disciplines for sure,
I assume - whereas what we mean when we compare something to mental gymnastics is usually as far
removed from maths as it gets. The comparison still stands! "Don't make me take out my Quaternions!".
(Well, in reality I could be good at math, but ... my brains affinity for it is actually negative.
My psyche is like coated with "math repellent".)
But ... we so have our understanding of the world; And based on that we form predictions. Predictions
on the other hand, I've learned, are part of what makes science work. The goal being to make accurate
predictions - and confirm that they are in fact accurate predictions.
But we don't always have the luxury. Yet, collecting data is a huge part of it all.
The Cons...err...Fascist modus operandi - as I've seen it play out on YouTube - generally includes
the practice I'd colloquially call "shitting into someone's head". To so unload a huge stinking pile
of garbage into the viewers brain - such that their predictions fall in their favor.
Similar things can be said about religion ... where ... a certain ideology or religion or whatever
can be graded according to how far removed from testable the predictions are. And so it shouldn't
come as a surprise that Fascism tends to cozy up with Bullshit Religions. Or "bullshittified"
religions. Here we can also add some kind of point of no return - err, point of resolution. So, when
the resolution arrives - how close or beyond too late are we then?
Arguably the fascist would try to to push that point of resolution into the "beyond" too late, rather
than leaving it in the "not quite yet too late". And maybe we needed the world to be in the place it
is today - simply because ... yea. I don't think any of us "lefties" could have predicted 'what's
actually happening' - but it's ... what it is. Well, I'm still curious as to whether or not there will
be a "real" false prophet - or if what we got is actually "it" already. But that's neither here nor
there right now.
But yea. Everyone who'd have argued that lefties are crazy, exaggerating, hysterical and all that - they
are kind of right. But not in a way that makes us feel like we were 'in the wrong'. The reason is because
... well, the signs have been there. The signs ARE there - for all those curious about what lies ahead.
And ... sparing you the issues with political affiliations; Opposite to those that try to push the point
of resolution as far out as possible, there are those that want to pull it as close in as possible.
Like, fascisms great promise is, that once you got rid of all the pesky minorities, things will be great.
Glorious even. And for those who don't actually care - there's all the candy of "getting there". Right?
Especially nowadays with computers and joysticks and what have you. And yea, a "healthy" dose of misogyny
for those who don't care about either.
So - the violent psychopaths have it easy. They get their resolution right away, it's as simple as 1+1
- and that's one reason to not like Fascism. Because, unless you're a psychopath - so the 'rational' mind
- why even bother? I mean, it shouldn't even be a question.
"Haha!" - the misogynist would interject. Well, not quite like so - but the story ... the one you kind of
have to piece together yourself ... is that one way or another it'll be easier to get laid. Whether you
acquire your spouse by social standing, paying off some broke family or going to the front for the war
crimes ... yea. It's not quite as simple as 1+1 - and honestly also a bit of a gamble, but if you're a
misogynistic piece of shit it might be your best bet nonetheless.
And yea, when these two kinds of people come together to build a unified front ... I suppose that that
can be intimidating. And that's already like ... the whole of fascism. Because the final thing, the point
when things "shall be glorious" - that's in essence just a fairy tale. I mean, World War 2 didn't end the
way the Nazis had envisioned. And I can't believe that ... phhhffft ... I mean - looking back ... you have
to be a total piece of shit to be on board with that.
And yea - zero sympathies! Try me!
Why would I say something like that?
Wishful thinking maybe?
Anyhow. But yea, we've heard it - like, Holocaust denial is a thing. Well, Jan6 denial is a thing. And how
many of those that got pardoned are like - already in for some other shit again? Like ... soliciting sex
from minors, producing child pornography and other heinous bullshit? Oh, I ... think I got that wrong. The
'producing child pornography' part was before - so, they were pardoned!
I mean, the words with which they describe Jan6 and the actual footage - like - side by side - will never
not baffle me!
So, moving past that - the thing is that there are also points of resolution within religion that are
rather close. Looking for those is also like ... one of the better things we can do in life.
To the outside, those may appear like a mystery. Like, you already need to be on the right track to see
where the road may be going. It's like ... a narrow path that leads to salvation.
And then there's ... Gender Issues, Climate Change, Capitalism and all of that stuff that "Libs" keep
talking about. I mean, we can say that if we make punching Nazis OK again - we may move past Capitalism.
That however isn't much different - albeit a lot more civilized - than what Fascists try to do.
However, there's the side that is afraid that Gender Issues will destroy Civilization and the side that
rage against it will, there's the side that thinks Climate Change will destroy civilization and the side
that thinks fixing it will, there's the side that thinks Capitalism will destroy Civilization and the
side that Socialism will. What the truth of that is - that's what either of those basically tries to make
a point for; And I think there's one side more correct than the other, partially based on the fact that
the other is filled with liars and grifters.
Do I need to say more? Not at this point, I think.
Formulating a Plan of sorts?
I might need some legal advice on these things - unless we're just thrown into a Civil-War-esque situation
from the get go. But ... outside of that, my base theory is this:
We start with one party that presents itself as Gnostic. The primary concept of the party would be to
basically crowdsource its agenda from "the Gnostic Establishment" - which would be our own Government of
sorts. So, while we work out democratic processes that work for us, structures, hierarchies and all that,
we formulate a contemporary set of ideals and beliefs - like, a Club of sorts. Then, when the party is
large enough, it can split up. So to mimic our internal structures, until eventually we're left with a
new world order.
This is a simple idea that doesn't really touch upon the complicated intricacies of actual politics. But
as Robert Habeck states - sort of - right now there shouldn't be much of a question. If we dare look the
serious facts in the face, a pretty straightforward path is laid out before us. Besides that ... there
sure are questions like: How much do we want to be intimidated by Russian asshole and co. - where ... I'm afraid
I'm not built to act like I'm intimidated at all.
But yea. I'm an idealist. And there is a comprehensible friction between idealism and "realism". It's
called courage.
"Courage gets you killed, Cowardice only gets you fucked!"? Well, such statements are essentially
worthless.
Our ideals are like the raw metal - and sticking to them is the process of forging it. Giving it shape.
Making it real. Any argument against it ... probably follows a fundamentally different set of ideals
that they don't really want to endorse openly, it seems. I mean, they try - however much they can get
away with plus a little extra to push the envelope; But intimidation is their tactic, and not responding
to it ... to perhaps just act like they don't exist (where possible), but to at any rate stick to our
ideals ... is to me the only logical way forward.
But of course, widespread support is somewhat required. Which is where Fascism has a bit of an edge
because you can just ignore all of that nonsense and let some grumpy snowflake douchebag dictate the
terms based on their mood that day.
Uhm, but yea. There is a worldly or material aspect to this that ... everyone basically has to come to
terms with themselves. So, I'm not sure if we really need political representation here.
I suppose it kind of depends.
What may be more important than political representation is ... journalism. I guess, for the start that's
also what we should actually focus on. Producing some kind of focus ... to more prominently separate
bullshit from reason. To do things right, by our ideals - where I hope that I can be good enough of an
argument to "make it stick". Like, otherwise there'd be like ten competitors trying to do the same while
throwing in some of their ideological nonsense - I mean, that's pretty much today as it is.
Uhm.
Whatever. I guess it's bad to like ... drag you into something like this. But I figure that if you're an
idealist and a journalist - you'd feel different about it. And, that's important. We are individuals with
different concerns for different things. We're all stuck somehow, with one another ... where it's
ultimately the individual impulses that drive us at large. And so, maybe the conclusion ought to be this:
We just start different things. I mean, I've been bothered by the state of the Church - but more so because
I wouldn't know where to begin restructuring it to like ... welcome literally everyone. Previously that wasn't
an issue. In my mind - all I need is the light of day. That should provide enough attention to keep things
rolling. But if the influx of new members is like ... thousand times of what it is now ... "at the very least"
(I don't know, I didn't do the math) - we might run into problems.
At the end of the day however, we don't actually need to channel everything through Church. Offering free
baptism with no strings attached to let everyone get into the Ninedom from there - that'd be a solution. From
there we wouldn't need an official registry of who's in either, as in principle each and every "part" could
take care of that themselves. All we need here is to establish which 'parts' are 'ours'.
That until we're ready to take the next step.
The thing is: Although scripture gives me a pretty good idea of what I have to expect, so far it still turned
out to be so, that "what comes around usually defies expectations". In theory I'm stuck with an image that
cannot account for all the moving parts, all the chaos of the world and such. Life is like ever shifting,
ever changing. And so, the ball is with each and everyone individually.
Knowing what team we're on ... helps I think.
But what does that now mean for me?
I don't know. But I suppose that we first have to get to the point where the Church has to do something from
a lack of capacity. And once we're there ... well, we'll have to see what we can do!
Am I missing something?
Anyhow ... here's a thing: The Revelation reads, that the Devil will be locked away for a thousand years. So
... chances are ... that the return of Christ is still ... that far out at the very least. (And yes, attempts
have been made ... but the Kingdom of God ... is not whatever "that" was. There isn't much wrong with the idea
that the Church is the rolling stone, if anything at all - so ... that's the SMASH that has to happen first!)