Better Nutri-Score

So, I had this idea. That there be some information on foods so that the consumer can easily read what they eat. Then; Probably unrelated to my idea; Came up with this idea called "Nutri Score". So, foods now have a ranking from A to E on their packaging which is somehow supposed to tell the consumer ... uh. "Something". I don't know. So, I got two sausages ... one gets a D and the other an E ... so, I'd pick D ... ?

This is NONSENSE!

So, what we need is a System. We have - I presume - an understanding of what the body needs. I guess. Say ... Iron and Proteins. And stuff. So, the important things can go into a list, we then come up with symbols and colors to highlight the important parts and then we say that ... the daily or weekly requirement sits at a 10. Then we can rank each food item ... well, not rank, but we can put on it how many points of so and so this thing has. With pamphlets and flyers we can provide an overview ... and the consumer can passively learn or at leaast have a better idea of what they're eating.

So, next we should ignore all the "unimportant" stuff because ... that's not the point here. And yea, it's on the... sigh. People like that ... I wanna ... . There are ingredients and tables on the back of the item but that's ... whatever. It'd be more helpful if I had a comprehensive number, say for calories, how much of the daily need I consume by eating the whole thing.
Not that the ingredients and stuff is useless, it's more detailed. OK? So SHUT UP!

Of course there's variance. Some people are like this, others like that; So yea ... 10 is just for reference - where, if You need more of this and that; That's a You problem. But my horizon ends way before having even an approximate idea of what I need during a week. And I don't want health recommendations; I want to know what the body needs.

K-I-S-S ... keep it simple stupid. But not too simple ... . Nutri-Score ... tsss ...