Videogames for World Peace - lets talk Politix

(And some other stuff - actually - I don't know exactly)
a.k.a.: Random Patrol 1



sow_of_satan.html - as the name would suggest - is another 'literal' 'succumbing' of myself into ... well ... myself - so, the sine curve moving down again. Part of whats written there should be sortof relevant; And one of those things is the transition into what I would here more commonly introduce by the word 'phases'. I named them 'hooks' for the lack of a better word - while in essence you could call them "what is at the base of !!!one of your!!! mindsets" - or, as we now think of multiple mindsets per person, the word 'phase' would pop to mind, so we can yet say that we do only have 'one' mindset with different phases.
It would make sense to see this 'up and down' thing in comparison to how to extract iron from cornflakes. Put them and water into a blender - use a strong magnet and you'll see the iron.
There is however no real way to connect to "the bottom of the wave either" - which would be logical. The average is the thing that matters. The average for me would however be hard to 'obtain' - as that is where the whole social dynamics come into play - and right now most of my life and cirucmstance thing is much of an up-pole; Like that magnet extracting that iron.


And this is also how the Antichristian Government works. Well, by not really being Antichristian. There are essentially supposed to be two sides, the Conservative and the Liberal sotospeak. They would need 'one' side that embraces all that is good 'but' God - so to force God into supporting the other side that embraces God, ... but well, not a thing that is good!
In case you wonder: Mormons aren't supposed to be Conservatives. There are two books they have that go by the title "Teachings of Joseph Smith" or something like that. There is a short version, ("duh"), which is easy to recognize as it is part of the "Teachings of the Presidents of the Church" 'Series' - basically guides, as, the Mormon version of History, ... kindof. So, at every time there is 'one' of those books part of what is being discussed. Or learned about. Thats what those books are for. There is however another, more extensive book - we might call it the 'nerd version' - and therein he states that being conservative is bad.
Now, your average Mormon would behave as any other Christian in defense of his/her religion, or any other believer of any religion. So, 'dubbing it with untempered mortar' as the Bible puts it. Can't remember where though. Its just a saying anyway. And I'm not even sure if I quoted it correctly. The point is clear though. The average Mormon wouldn't want to believe that being conservative is wrong, so, he/she would come up with some kind of explenation - and yea - its one of those things that isn't inherantly a bad thing; Say - 'to explain' cannot be inherantly a bad thing. Anyway. But what does 'conservative' mean? We can know that US American history had a shift at some point between what Republicans and Democrats stand for. Lincoln was Republican but pursued what we by today would consider Liberal politics; While the Democrat vice-president pretty much was a Republican by modern standards.
Instead of 'Liberal' there is also the word 'Progressive'. Lincoln was progressive. The Democrats were conservative. Conservative comes from 'Conservation' I suppose, and so, Jesus was totally Anti-Conservative - at least, whenever having beef with any of the Religious leaders of the Jews we can look at it from a 'Progressive vs Conservative' stance.

Being Conservative is all about 'maintaining' the errors and glitches of our political systems as they work - as the saying goes: "If it ain't broke don't fix it!". This leads to racism, for instance, as the 'other culture' 'threatens' this 'clockwork' of how things work. Its easier to blame the 'new influx' for the problems we have than to see the flaw of our own. So we need someone to blame ... in order to be conservative.
Being conservative is also the 'easy' way - its the way of saying: I don't know enough to make an educated choice so I vote for how things have been so far.

Can't argue with that!


The Reps vs. Dems thing shouldn't take the 'Democrats' turn if that'd boost Atheism to a no-good Level - and the whole feminism vs gamers thing is also something of an Atheists vs Religion thing. The Atheists have a point though. Its the whole 'republican/conservative' Religion though. That is conservative, its bad, so ... yea for progressive! The result is entirely unintended by any of the un-initiated participants; So, I need to coin the term 'Preservative', because ... thats what 'having a home' is about. So, that we want to secure our livelihood as thats been what our Survival on this Planet has spun around since ever as far as Archaeology is concerned. Else we'd still live in caves.
Conservative also goes on to say: We become too many people on this planet, but we cannot change our system - so: Genocide! Preservation or Progression would rather fail trying to yet make it work than going down that Conservative road.

Can argue with that - but it'd make you a moron!




"Hmm... Upgrades!".

This is now the third time I had to move back from what I've written - telling me that the Antichristians now have increased their effort on Jinxing. The thing is that as I moved on writing about stuff ... well, I for once noticed that I'm yet missing a 'point' - which would be a totally independent topic ... namely 'Zion' ... while pretty much any line of argument I could choose from would else lead up into a Jinxed environment. He's probably reading this as I'm writing - and despite all the things at hand the 'feeling' is pretty much the opposite - that I got pretty much nothing going for me.
At this point I feel like I'm pretty much supposed to put words into your mouth - and ... yea well, what can I say? "I believe in Allah and what was given to the Prophets - and truely I'm a believer!".

That is the stance from where operating this makes sense! Thinking of Games. If we think about it either way we're stuck between major companies, titles with split communities (which is also about people playing games that are 'stuck' in a game they kindof rather wouldn't play); And next to a whole lot of other stuff also your every now and a then console war or "this game sucks" competition. Its not odd that the moment a new game concept comes out there are a lot and lots of clones; Where - I cannot play Nioh for the Love of God. I ... played it for a while and I was happy to stop playing it. I kindof despise it. There are a few things I liked about it - but I'm sick of 'pitty liking' a game! On the other side there is NieR Automata - which I inwardly also cracked down upon in a sense of despise, but eventually its been fun enough to play; Though its not a game I would want to spend any money on. Nier is only mentioned in regards to my emotional stance to Nioh. And that has nothing to do with Dark Souls. It could be that my emotional stance to either of those games is in part influenced by the guy with whom I was playing them. Saying that his 'hyping' for both, Nioh and Nier, got to me in a sense that I would be forced to play and enjoy them; And every little thing I could dislike would therefore somehow 'crack through' and make me inwardly upset about the game. For Honor is a game he does vocally take distance from - and Horizon is a game he did pretty much hype as well. Both are games I wouldn't have bought - but I'm sure that every other clone that would come out next would be kindof closer on my radar. And this is pretty much the way it is because of the way things are - most dominantly: Problems of a free market.
And because a free market is good - we do here get to one of those 'doom loops' - as what I wanted would seem paradox.
Taking the believers standpoint is in first about in no way connected to that. Then we learn of tolerance and there it is kindof a no-go to think the free market away. So we're stuck with ... 'issues' - not problems, actually.

Or: First world problems. Maybe 'Zeroeth World Problems' actually. Yet it are these issues where the Jinx/Hype/Astair is ultimately detrementally sickening. And its hard to 'filter out' the few things that actually matter. For instance: Why do we love to shout out about games we like? There is an Astair inclusive and an Astair exclusive answer, though they follow pretty much the same idea. If I love a game, I want to share it so that others can play it too and that would lead to an overall more positive atmosphere. If people on the other hand hype up games that suck - and by my emotional situation Nioh is easily the worse game of all times while I wouldn't be too surprised if my emotions about that game did at some point pop up in words against Dark Souls. Thereby maybe also trashing Nioh, but, all that such an argument needed is an "they should have done it like in Nioh" blanket statement and ... that'd work!
What the free market 'adds' to that is on the good end of course innovation. Also variety. But whats stuck on my mind is how come that I'm not into the games I'm into. Its being financially conservative.
And a lot of games actually support a conservative playstyle. Like ... I hate it in for Honor when the enemy runs away the moment he's near defeat. If we wanted to play the game that way, speaking of victory and loss, then we might as well not fight at all! Thats how you win! Kindof. I mean, its a win win! And if I were God I'd burn those people alive on spot!
Which would be the wrong thing to do. There are gray areas; ... and my oppinion isn't the only one valid there. And if I run after someone in rage and then get tossed down a cliff ... thats my own fault! So, that is as is with life.

So - taking the blievers standpoint doesn't change any of that significantly - or even in the slightest - but it doesn't matter because on that standpoint you're also concerned of other things - as anyway - and by wanting Godly things we get to a more Godly reality - as simple as that!
And to move on, there's a difference between what I want and what I see - obviously. I mean, ... while sometimes we only see what we want ... there is still that difference between wanting and seeing. So I would write about things I see ... which put into a "political context" could be taken for things I want. That I cannot argue against - and the reason why I couldn't tell you what I want to tell you is ... essentially because the Antichristians wouldn't want you to understand what I'm trying to tell you. So I feel. Or ... 'see'. Every image or vision I have on my mind that I want to express to further explain what I'm trying to explain does on thought of expressing it get echoed in a way that I certainly cannot agree with. So, the first big problem thereby is communism. So, whenever soemone tried to argue to you that what I wanted is communism - you say: Yes and No! I don't want communism, I don't want democracy, I don't want Monarchy, ... and whatever it is you believe or suggest that I want - no! Its not it! Out of principle!
Because these words embody complex mechanisms - and how many democracies do we have right now that each work different? I mean, there are officially 'three types of democracy'. What I want is a fourth type of that, which is also another form of communism which is another form of Monarchy and if you so will also another form of Despotism or Religious Dictatorship. Whatever!
If my idea then sounds 'communistic' you should therefore not go and accuse me of wanting to do it as 'communists fail' - but you should 'hope' that I am not gonna do that!

The first 'fail' were that taking a communistic stance on the Games industry would be like shoving all game devs into 'one' "Company" - and if I said its a bad idea it were a good idea and if I said it were a good idea it were a bad idea. It would either way break back down into groups - with a however more open 'flavour' to say, people could move from one into another more easily, they could co-operate; And there wouldn't be a company that'd just clone another game or resorts to some free to play model for the sake of money, thus we'd get to more genuine artworks over all. The second 'fail' were to think that I would want that all those groups should use the same engine. This argument shouldn't be able to stand though because its opposed to my fundamental ideology of art. A 'third' big issue is the perspective of control. Like, "we take all game devs and shove them into a building". Like, who is 'we'? What building? Or further: Who is in control to then say who is in control? In the 'Antichristian Government' that were the Antichrist - as you can imagine that Trump would use his current power to get more Antichristian Agents into key positions ... like, who says who can be a General? Would the majority agree with that person? Or those people? But once you have an Antichristian General - there's a branch of the Military that is corrupted - and will most like become more and more corrupted. The more corrupt it is, the more support it will get from the Antichristian whole - and ... we might at some point as well just shoot ourselves.

I don't believe in that kind of control! Sortof. I mean, the part with the Generals - thats pretty much what I would do. The agenda being of course security - and the main prospect of that security were to ascertain that things run as they are supposed to. And if that would need an update - there would be another 'One'.

I believe in Science! I believe that if 90+% of our scientists say that Climate Change is a thing - that it is a fucking thing! There is no Authority implied. Otherwise I guess its "Bill Nye for President". I mean, its a simple thing. Thinking in control and institutions and all that - that is nonsense! Its an illusion, or a delusion ... more to the point. Science or the Games Industry are the best example of that. Yea, there is control and there are institutions - but they emerge(d) from society. What these 'emergences' thus need is a way to 'connect'. And you should bet your ass on the fact that the result of those connections would be differnt amongst Enlightened folks. To say, the need to connect were known by God - and also all and everything round about it so that you only need to heed God in order to make the best of what you want!
But what do we have? We have now a US Government that actively denies Climate Change. And if there are reason to do so - I mean, 'real' reasons, like 'knowing' that its a thing but yet for the greater good having no choice but to ignore it, then sorry - of course that should change my perspective. And the reason why we wouldn't know of those reasons is because of Secret Nonsense Government Politics BS - and to be clear about it: I can think of arguments; But none that convince me! Not unless I ignored things that I flat out ... wouldn't? Shouldn't? Couldn't? Won't! There is a final picture that I won't allow to get compromised - and I'm convinced that ... uhm, lets put it another way: If it turned out that we do have a Stargate - the first logical thing for me; So in this idea of transitioning from now to then; Were to say that - giving a fuck of whether Russia or whoever does or doesn't like it. Same if Russia had it - and they were our enemy. We should know that! As a whole. When it gets to details however, there is a line ... things you should know and things ... well. At some point I'd ask the Press to move in and do its Job ... and next get prepared to argue against all the nonsensical demands "the Public" came up with. What I mean to say is that Trump is a moron - and to warn the enemy of an attack before it happens is a 'good' strategy because the enemy maybe abandons the place and is easier to take, or the enemy will fortify it and is easier to take. Everything can backfire. If I knew where the enemy hides its secrets, thats however a different story.

The first rule of draining the swamp is to find a way of doing so. Taken as metaphor we so first have to define 'swamp'. This is maybe overkilling it ... but nonetheless accurate. What I mean is that these 'Government Suites' - these 'closed doors' - they have to go away. At least so in the sense of 'that' being part of the government. Experimentally think of it so: If we had a digital map of the world - metaphorically speaking - and every person could place red dots on it if something pissed him or her off ... like Trump or Erdogan ... I wonder how the map would look. This isn't "Jinxable". Kindof. Its manipulatable by strategic placement of information - but you're gonna place a dot only once you're really mad ... angry or upset ... so, thats 'you'. Just so. There is no "how do others think?" - no "looking in the Aether for an answer of where to place them dots" - just a big fucking reason for the Antichristians to lay low!

But that is a utopic idea ... as of course in our current society that wouldn't work any better than the rest!

And so pretty much the whole idea is in essence to have things the way they were minus all of the right-wing/antichristian/conservative nonsense. And to all the right wingers: Think about whom you're raging against, if not right-wingers of other nations!
Where's the Joke in Erdogan calling us Nazis?


To say: Not to keep them as they were - but to improve on them. To do that we can however not need wild Hyped up accusations of how bad everything is. Else you get Trumpcare instead of Obamacare ... so, aid for the Rich instead of aid for the Poor, for instance. Because ... thats what you'd want!

In a right world - if all said: Obamacare is good - it wouldn't stay the way it was either. But once all hate on it - an institution has an easier time to do nonsense as thats what everyone wants out of it anyway.


Bushido Blade

by Christopher Nikolaus Sonnberger | 2017.03.13 | 17:20

If I google for Bushido in germany I mostly get stuff about that rapper. The second time I googled it, after I the first time clicked the 'one single' 'Bushido (not the rapper)' link (wikipedia), that link didn't show up! LOL! FUCK YOU GOOGLE! (Lesson: Search Wikipedia directly rather than via Google! ??? - ... [shaking my head]"

However ... the Enlish page sucks. Here's a quote from the Inazo Nitobe book as found on the german site, translated by me: "Bushido so is the Codex of these moral principles, which the Knights (Samurai) should observe. It is not an in first place writtenly fixed Codex; It consists of principles, that have been traditioned by mouth and only every once in a while did flow from the feather of well known Knights and Scholars. It is a Codex, that declares truthful acts as holy, a Law, that is written in Heart. Bushido doesn't found on on the creative activity of an able brain or the life of a famous person. It is muchmore the product of organic growth in centuries of military development/evolution".

I don't mean to propagate Bushido - although when taking certain things away ... I mean, there is a stem within Bushido that does very well work for me. As a Warriors codec that so has been refined over time there is a clear Cultural and Pragmatic nuance to it that westerners or people who simply haven't grown up as a real Samurai can hardly obtain - as a matter of having these principles engraved in your mind.
I see it as a trait of the Japanese mentality (where 'national mentality' to me is mostly encoded within language/pronounciation) that they have a strong will with a strong emphasis on emotion ... and Bushido fits right into that. The emotions of a warrior who is to defend his mortal body in battle in service of something else ... those are things I find when reading into Bushido.
Eventually we can see Bushido as a way of Propaganda ... where there are the seven virtues that 'bond' the Samurai to a leader - not questioning whether this leader adheres to the same standards, such as honor or truthfulness.

To learn: There are in deed many ways to expand upon one topic. So usually the 'exclusive' approach ("But Bushido is just Propaganda!") - is usually - not that ... good!

Unification is awesome - my oppinion - because ... my mind is sortof as dissolved within all the information there is (I know of) - though the point would usually so be 'the whole topic' in context to a couple of ideas - not as a 'you have to believe it' but as a 'JUST FUCKING LOOK AT IT!'. Which is weird (not as 'crazy' as 'strange') I guess. That neither is a 'now you must' but an 'eventually you will' (dig it).


Peace! [17:56] (I mean, what can I do? Once I have two topics that 'collide well' with each other, that is ... somehow entertaining. So, I say this and that and see things collide and it is good - as to my understanding. So ... its a problem I have to work on - to explain the things that collide or how ... as sometimes topics are just too vast for you to easily see the links. And sometimes my information is flawed - so that the links only make sense from a certain perspective. So I did unerline the part of the quote important to me - but eventually 'the pool' of information available to a topic should to some extent suffice, saying, well, ... 'make it your way, without changing the way nor adapting to it' - a.k.a. "find your way accross the planes, there is only one door".

Uhm, which means sometimes I guess that terms would have to be redefined - which is then - more a fragment of my Anarchistic mentality. [18:18])

But if you really mean to be upset about the 'Bushido Blade' part - alternatives that work are: "Pizza Combo", 'Deus Vult' - 'Te Sacabo' and 'Inseca Vos' are too PUC - (Politically Uncorrect) - So, rather than that "For Rhetoric" works ... kindof. Yea ... "It isn't a real title" ... maybe. ... [18:35]


No end in sight

(Really, I don't see it. Whenever there seems to be something like a light at the end of the tunnel - its usually just nothing.) And still: By "I am alone" and "There is no group I officially support" I mean that in response to my writing and talking there was so far only 'one' person that made a real attempt of connecting to me; And it was as though God wouldn't want us to ever talk about it again. There is nobody that you need to recognize as somehow connected to me, in regards to my Christian ministry. There may be independent groups - but thats what they then are, independent. What I know of them is suggestive, or "supersticion" - so the total sum of human beings involved into this work right now ... is ... '1' (and that is me). And the workload ... to make what I do at any point anyhow useful - is right now too much for me! As is obvious.

And so I wonder why I'm here. Nothing makes any sense - and the only light there is is that bit of fun I have consuming entertaining media. Aside of ... playing with myself. Which I do a lot. I mean, most of my life is basically just that. And in average I think of Sex, which is awkward if surrounded by people I don't wanna think such about - and I'm kindof used to dreaming away anyway ... which so is basically the core of my existence. That is not what I consider 'God given' - its ... 'there'. Its ... as it is. And I have to understand that its rather 'what God left' - and the entire pointlessness of my life isn't all that pointless when considering what I ended up doing. Everything else is pretty much pointless - and that is pretty much life as it is! And so while everything is pointless ... making things better for us is the best thing we can do! So I guess its ...



See you when you get there!


19:57 ... [phew] (And my actual reason to call it 'Bushido Blade' of course was that it 'clicked'. So there may be more to it than just what I would imply. [And: I ultimately cannot believe that my male side is as irrelevant as my feelings make it. Its the weird thing. There is an absolute within, though still rather non-gendered attractions that express themselves through gender - which I shouldn't doubt has to be mutual. Which so includes also the emotional/absolutes ... and what we enjoy about life is somehow ... a matter of how we (she/they and I) align ... easy! So, whenever there is something of which we could have 'too much' ... in a bad way ... there's gonna be something else to counter that ... to say: Too much 'for us' is what 'we' say (feel/experience) as that!]) - ... EEEEND! [20:07]